As a reminder, current estimates are that quantum cracking of a single 2048-bit RSA key would require a computer with 20 million qubits running in superposition for about eight hours. For context, quantum computers maxed out at 433 qubits in 2022 and 1,000 qubits last year. (A qubit is a basic unit of quantum computing, analogous to the binary bit in classical computing. Comparisons between qubits in true quantum systems and quantum annealers aren’t uniform.) So even when quantum computing matures sufficiently to break vulnerable algorithms, it could take decades or longer before the majority of keys are cracked.

The upshot of this latest episode is that while quantum computing will almost undoubtedly topple many of the most widely used forms of encryption used today, that calamitous event won’t happen anytime soon. It’s important that industries and researchers move swiftly to devise quantum-resistant algorithms and implement them widely. At the same time, people should take steps not to get steamrolled by the PQC hype train.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    And everyone thinks about real time implications, what about historical ? Seems pretty likely that the NSA has been storing an appreciable fraction of the internet for a long damn while. Come Q-Day that all gets opened and searchable. What would Trump do ?

    • azuth@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Nothing, he will be dead. Anyone that NSA would bother to use their new and expensive quantum machines on will be an organization that should know better than to be compromised by decades old secrets getting out.

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 days ago

        You’re no fun, orange turnip was merely an example of a bad actor getting control (going Reagan would be confusingly amusing) and it’s not about anyone in particular, more so the entire worlds’ dirty laundry out to dry

    • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Just because you can break RSA doesn’t mean you instantly get access to all private databases.

      Encryption by itself isn’t important. You know all those big company data leaks that seem to happen every month? That data was very likely encrypted. But it doesn’t matter because when you control a computer, you can see the encryption keys being used and decrypt whatever is stored.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Man, quantum computers has been about-to-break-encryption since the 90s. The hype never ends, just a new crop of people first hear it then figure out it’s bullshit.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Not to mention we already have quantum-computer-resistant cryptography.

        • Evotech@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          There’s an idea for a crypto. You send a message, another message (or 100000) gets created by ai I guess, and based on some predetermined hash the retriever must calculate which is correct, the lie/other message is discarded.

          I’ll call it Never tell a lie, or NTL

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      But isn’t the point that we just need to stay ahead of it. Surely encryption used in the 90s could be broken by a quantum computer today?

        • Dave@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 days ago

          It seems the RSA-155 (512 bit) encryption commonly used in the 90s was broken in 1999, no quantum needed (due to it being based on primes).

          Though from what I can search up, reddit users from 10 years ago were confident a 128 bit modern algorithm (e.g. AES) would never be able to be brute forced, even by quantum computers.

          I dunno, sometimes I wonder if not everyone on the internet is an expert.

      • Pappabosley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Didn’t you hear, they’ve almost succeeded at nuclear fusion, almost 90 whole seconds of stable fusion, any day now

    • humblebun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ok, I decided to dive into it today again and look what I’ve found:

      1. They still demonstrate supremacy to each other proving that their setup couldn’t be simulated. These 433 and 1000 qubit processors are good only for one purpose: to simulate itself.

      2. Photonic QC still estimates hafnian billions times faster; if only this mathematical structure appeared to have any practical meaning

      3. They demonstrated that toric codes might be effective

  • SteelGeneral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Just parroting stuff I heard at black hat, but aside from all the above don’t we first need to have millions of logical qubits? I believe the numbers people advertise now are just physical qubits.