Similar vibes than Reddit api pricing

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 days ago

        But what launch provider should I use then?

        Boeing? No, I don’t think so.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 days ago

            You don’t like GNSS?

            Also space programs have been the source of a lot of world changing inventions.

                • VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  Are you? stfu or go invent a microwave that prevents neoliberal mayors and govenors (at least in the US’s system) from sicking cops on their own constituents while giving the real estate contracts to their buddies who are only interested in building McMansions. 🤡

                  Edit: As a rule I dont get dragged into pointless debates.

                  Im as enthusiastic for space as they come.

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pjdJa122I4

                  Simply put, until we address the root causes of systemic injustice which are low hanging fruit, and by that I mean do away with the parasitic billionaires who prevent that, any venture into space shall be doomed to come crashing back down for the self-canniblizing fascism which imperialism is.

                  It’d be funny, if it werent so sad, to see clearly the indignance and hipocrisy from those who believe themselves so enlightended, double down on the “importance of space” exploitation, capital extraction and colonization…without ever considering the rest of the picture.

                  I used to be bothered by the lyric

                  spendin all their OUR money building rockets they can shoot into the stars

                  Neoliberals had their chance with this fucking dynamic, and blew it.

                  I have no interest in a future in space that is owned by assholes and authoritarians. That doesnt mean i give up on Star Trek. It means I recognize this society is barreling ignorantly toward the bell riots.

          • WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I agree that manned space programs are unnecessary and unmanned should be very limited. Starlink shouldn’t have been allowed. Unfortunately the US government let telecoms off the hook when it came to serving rural areas.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        If you’re on a boat… fair enough.

        Otherwise, look into WISPs… Wireless Internet Service Providers. Great for rural areas, the infrastructure is point-to-point radios, so it’s super easy to go large distances without the cost of fiber or copper cables.

        Best part is, if you have any neighbors that are interested, they’ll often give you a discount if you let them put a sector antenna on your barn/silo. Or they can also erect a short tower if you let them too.

        If there aren’t any in your immediate area, reach out to ones nearby. They’re always looking to expand.

        • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          And be locked down to awful local companies? Starlink was cheaper, faster and more reliable than the Canadian alternatives

          I know it’s not always the case, but even then, it’s a global choice versus a local one when it comes to travelling beyond just boats and giving a guaranteed service

          Edit: Woah. Wireless Internet has a lot of issues in Canada, limited speeds, slowdowns, hidden fees… You get rid of that by paying double and getting also double the speed and without anything else hidden

          Albeit you’re stuck to starlink services, but that’s just a downside of satellite internet

    • GHiLA@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      …Ok, now what? Is evil defeated yet?

      edit: He’s a fucking cabinet member. Think of something real unless you all want to go hit him with pillows in disgust.

  • Rookeh@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Something to note: Tesla has two vehicle APIs, the Fleet API for commercial accounts and the Owner API for individuals. This change currently only impacts the Fleet API.

    If you are an individual owner who accesses your vehicle data from the Owner API (usually via a self hosted tool like TeslaMate), this does not affect you. Yet.

    • modus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m not a developer, so excuse me if this is a dumb question. Is the API supplying data that is provided by the OBDII interface? Or is it more than that?

      • Rookeh@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        5 days ago

        There is most likely an overlap on what you can get from the OBD port, but generally speaking the API will provide more high level info e.g driving status, mileage, live location - and the OBD port will provide more low level data e.g. detailed battery stats from the BMS, energy usage, etc.

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      87
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hey kid, don’t waste your breath defending corporations. You will end up being wrong in the end, and before that you just look like a fool.

        • jaek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          41
          ·
          5 days ago

          Isn’t it tacitly defending this pricing model?

          I’ve worked in commercial environments where we’ve had the rug pulled on us in exactly this manner.

          Sure today Tesla isn’t charging you, but the moment it is expedient for them, they will.

          A lot of users here will have had the same experience with Reddit – it’s not unprecedented.

          • Rookeh@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Not at all.

            Lemmy is overwhelmingly militantly anti-Tesla, which is understandable considering who owns it, but it does mean that users tend to interpret any neutral or factual statements (basically anything that is not outright criticism) as having a pro-Tesla bias.

            In this case, all I am stating is the fact that this specific change currently only affects corporate users. That could of course change in the future.

            There is a rich history of cloud based data providers pulling the rug from under users with no warning. Look at what happened to Nest users when Google took over.

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Providing and clarifying information isn’t automatically defending something.

  • _number8_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    150
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    API pricing is such a shitty obnoxious dogshit practice that is now of course becoming standard because of course it is. internet barely costs money come the fuck on make a quality product

    It used to be a respected standard for developers and hosts to be somewhat open and friendly to 3rd party devs, because ultimately they’re customers and they’re helping recruit and retain customers, they should be treated with respect. just because it’s innovative and disruptive to invent the machine gun doesn’t mean it’s good

    • smitty825@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      The internet (ie bandwidth) is cheap, but running servers, providing documentation and tech support all costs a decent amount of money.

      However, treating an API as a profit center is a joke. These are literally companies developing software that makes the experience of owning a Tesla better. Making things unaffordable for those companies is putting short term profits over long term success of your product

      • Gingernate@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        5 days ago

        But 90k is nothing to Tesla, it’s just a paywall to keep the third party devs put while being able to claim to be open

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          while being able to claim to be open

          Marketing is happy while dafdy gets to squeeze

          Anyway, look at their actions, not their propaganda

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I have the slightest bit of sympathy. So many companies got their shit scraped and fed into AI models. They lost out. They’re afraid it will happen again.

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Another reminder to developers to not bother with public APIs, just screen-scrape or reverse-engineer the official app private API.

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        This. It’s a recipe for disaster. I think enough (tech-related) companies have shown now, that they first want to lock you in, and then if they got you, want to bleed you out…

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      Then you’re at risk of getting sued for cracking the encryption or the API breaking constantly

      The real reminder is don’t integrate with devices which you can’t trust

      • auzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah guys. Downvote me. This is literally part of my day job.

        In our industry we call not using an official API a dumpster fire API. Because more than once it has completely broken eventually, and there are a few manufacturers warned will break in the upcoming future

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          Is it illegal to scrape? I mean most companies and governments scrape huge amounts of data all the time without getting anyones permission, hell the entire business of a search engine is basically WeScrape4U.

          • lemonskate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 days ago

            If you extract a key from a proprietary client to decrypt a private API, it definitely is illegal. If you do this as a corporation, it would also be easy to detect by abnormal usage patterns tied to your account and presents you as a nice big set of pockets to get sued.

            Just screen scraping isn’t illegal, but is fragile as fuck and will break at the worst time and you have no ability to implement version control to manage it.

            • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 days ago

              Personally I wouldn’t want to be the guy forced to write scrapers with how much they break on any modern site

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 days ago

    When Twitter (and Reddit) pulled this off, I was just mildly pissed. Can’t do interesting things with my data, oh no.

    …Image that, except it’s an expensive luxury car you’re no longer allowed to do interesting things with.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    So musk pulled a Reddit spez?

    Not surprising as musk is a scammer who got incredibly lucky, always has been.

    Fuck spez and fuck musk

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    I’m surprised devs didn’t see the writing on the wall after Twitter all but murdered its API

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    One more reason I’m glad I bought a car with CarPlay / Android Auto support.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Hehehe, we all know how that’s like. I’m sure this income will truly be used to improve their services and support robust and reliable API infrastructure.