• _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      We already paid for the god damn infrastructure ourselves and the invention of the Internet itself through our tax dollars. Why the hell do ISPs get to profit from it infinitely with almost no meaningful regulation to protect you and me (who, again, already paid for this shit several times over).

      Fun fact: ISPs have received almost half a TRILLION dollars in kickbacks funded by taxpayer dollars on top of everything else. Regulatory capture is a real problem.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And because corporations aren’t people, here’s the CEOs that ran things during 2014:

          Hans Vestberg (b 1965) Verizon

          Randall Lynn Stephenson (b 1960) AT&T

          Glen F Post (b 1952) CenturyLink

          We let these people act with impunity in our society but it doesn’t need to be this way. Look at how Elon, who thrives on attention, flips out over being tracked and heckled. They stole hundreds of billions from us but we don’t even act like it.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Internet is not a base requirement like water. Without food, water, shelter, you die. Without internet and electricity you are left behind, you don’t die. It should be regulated like electricity

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          You can survive without running water. You can survive without Internet.

          Lack of Internet will make survival harder, just like lack of running water (if not to the same degree)

          Keep in mind, if you fall behind too far people will kick you out of your house, disrupt any attempts to make a shelter, significantly increases rates of death for a variety of causes

        • JoShmoe@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Adding to this, we aren’t being charged separately for using the bathroom, livingroom, or garage. The internet should not be divided as such.

        • Neato@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Internet is not a base requirement like water. Without food, water, shelter, you die. Without internet and electricity you are left behind, you don’t die. It should be regulated like electricity

          Yes because being homeless and without power will definitely ensure you can stay alive. This whole argument doesn’t make sense. Electricity doesn’t need to be regulated like water because for the most part, there can’t be tainted electricity. But you can still get your water cut off just like power so clearly the government doesn’t ensure you have ready access to it.

          Oh and shelter is a base requirement but we still let people die in the streets. And for those people we aren’t supplying them with water: they can drink from what few public fountains exist in parks…if the cops don’t beat them for “loitering”.

          No, internet should be a requirement to be provided to everyone like we regulate water and electricity and (used to) telephone service.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          A man wandering the desert doesn’t turn up at the edge of town asking for the WiFi password. :-)

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just think. In Article 1 of the US Constitution, the same article that creates Congress, also creates a federal post office system. Remote communication was so important that’s where it was described using the latest technology of the time.

      There are so many systems today that need similar treatment. Internet. Medical. Education. Job Training.

      And no, I don’t mean fed government enforced monopoly. I mean, UPS exists and competes with the USPS. But there is a minimum level of service in operation.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Just think. In Article 1 of the US Constitution, the same article that creates Congress, also creates a federal post office system.

        We’ve spent the last 40 years trying to privatize the function of the Post Office and dismantle it as a federal agency.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          there’s a pretty good fucking argument that mail - paper mail, not packages - should simply be all email or at the worst, scanned and transmitted electronically.

          LOL @ the downvotes - you think they can’t look at your mail already?

          HOW FUCKING DUMB ARE YOU CHILDREN? bwhahahaah

            • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              you don’t think they’re able to peep into your mail if they want to already?

              and that the slight level of ‘security’ the service provides isn’t outweighed by the enormous savings in fuel burned as the silly truck visits every house every weekday simply to deliver a flyer from the grocery?

              pffft