• kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’d be fine if 1) everything from Control Panel is implemented and properly working and 2) everything stays consistent (because otherwise, as other folks have mentioned, at one point written tutorials even with screenshots quickly become obsolete). I don’t see this happening any time soon.

    Maybe instead of that they can start encouraging people to use the command line, although even fewer settings are reachable though there.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      3 months ago

      Their settings pages are the worst; full of white space, finding what they considered “advanced” settings is usually a pain in the ass, and everything is dumbed down to a mind-numbing extent.

      I’ve hated Settings pages with a passion since they were introduced, and always typed the full .msc I was looking for.

      • 1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 months ago

        I really hate that you can only open one settings page at a time. There is no justification to making you lose your place you’re working on just because you want to adjust another minor setting. With the old interface I can e.g. have network and sound settings open at the same time and I don’t know why they took that away.

      • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        the loss of info density in favor of making everything fingerable has been one of the worst things to happen to anyone slightly inclined at managing systems. i hate trying to manage things in a touch based UI. so much fucking scrolling and wasted space. it does look nice , but fuck is it a productivity killer.

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I also dislike the design layout. Eg. I much prefer the control panel version of Disk Management than the settings purely from an aesthetics stand point. Each disk and their partitions are just easier to see and differentiate from others.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      I guarantee you they’ve only ported over about half of the Control Panel’s features. The common stuff, sure. The rest…

    • kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Talking about consistency, technically Windows still has UI elements from 3.1 era at Atleast couple of obscure places.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      3 months ago

      the control panel they’re taking away is largely just antiquated and not used anymore in favour of settings app anyway

      • LoftySnowman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        There are still things that don’t work in the new UI. A common example for me is changing the output of speakers on my htpc. Sometimes after an update it reverts to 2.0. Need to launch the old sound control panel to set it back to 7.1.

      • bluewing@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Users complain about changes being made and then they complain that change doesn’t happen enough.