• EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Whats wrong with bluesky? I hear this general sentiment about it but have never even looked at it.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      8 months ago

      I believe, people are mostly annoyed that Bluesky started yet another (half-baked) standard, rather than throwing their weight behind ActivityPub.

      This would be fine, if they were decidedly a for-profit company, but their whole branding is that they want to benefit humanity.

      It’s also weird that the former CEO of Twitter is involved.
      The guy could have pushed Twitter into that direction, but apparently, he needed a separate project to have this change of heart.

      Like, I don’t know, they’ve got some things that look alright:

      • They’ve open-sourced some things.
      • It’s legally a Public Benefit Company.
      • They’ve got the creator of XMPP on board, so that at least makes it credible that they genuinely want to come up with a better protocol.
      • Their CEO is a techie.

      But yeah, I’m still worried, it ends up being a bait-and-switch. Make it all look good for now and once enough users have signed up, slowly transition to just becoming yet another Twitter.

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s run by Jack. The same Jack, founder of Twitter that was at the helm while Twitter went to shit before Musk got it. I know Musk era has been really bad, but it was getting really bad under Jack. I wouldn’t trust a social network run by him or Musk or Zuck.