• Plopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Destructive in that many edits are lossy. Change the transform of an object, then go do a bunch of other edits, and then go back and edit that same transform again. What you’ll be editing now is the edited image, not the original one (as in Photoshop), so there’s massive data loss and it looks absolute crap. If you want to edit with the original image as origin you have to undo all edits back to before you edited the transform the first time.

    Non-destructive editing should be coming in the future, and they might have implemented some non-destructive things since I last used it.

    • Trail@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I tried to read up on it, i understand it in theory, but in practical terms I don’t get what’s the difference to just working with layers…

      I guess I might have to play around a bit with it to get it? I dunno…

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Layers aren’t edits, they’re layers. Edits you make to layers or parts of layers. That image whose transform was being edited in my previous example would be on its own layer.

        Also, it’s been a while since I used Gimp so I’m going off of very vague memories that I have tried to erase with copious amounts of alcohol.