• kevin@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    162
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    We have seen this game 100 times. Opt in for now and then turned on for everyone 6-12 months later. It’s just a temporary move to handle the bad PR.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      5 months ago

      registry switch that’ll mysteriously reset itself. we’ve had this shit with countless windows configurations at work that our IT guy has to battle with on the regular.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’ve had so many people jump down my throat for listing some of the many obviously fucked things Microsoft did on my PC just over the life of Windows 10. (And not that it should matter, but I even paid for Pro).

        I turned all their various advertising and spying “features” off through legitimate settings, group policies, whatever, and the list of things that reverted themselves over time was insane.

        • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          5 months ago

          User: Goes through 15 step process to turn off unwanted “feature”.

          Windows: I turned this on, in case it got turned off accidentally. I’ll do this every reboot.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          And not that it should matter, but I even paid for Pro

          It should matter though. If MS wants to give away Windows for free, then users should expect compromised privacy. But it’s not. They charge hundreds for it.

          If Windows made a paid version that was private and secure, and that the user was in control of, I would buy it in a heartbeat.

          • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            If they were giving away Windows for free, their behavior would still be unforgivable.

            There is no scenario where any operating system including spyware or ads can ever theoretically be acceptable behavior. Any person who contributes in any way to that happening belongs in a prison cell.

              • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Linux is free qnd plenty sustainable.

                If you can’t support providing something for free via a mechanism that isn’t pure and unadulterated evil, then don’t do it for free. “We have to be monsters to make money” is not a valid position.

                • helenslunch@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Linux is free qnd plenty sustainable.

                  It also has a vast array of enormous compromises, which is why no one uses it.

                  • arf@lemmy.today
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I understand you have qualms with Linux, and that’s plenty fine, but when the large majority of servers and smartphones around the world run it, you can’t say that no one uses it.

                  • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    That’s not true at all. It has a huge market share, just not in desktops.

                    But again, that’s completely and utterly irrelevant. If being evil is the only way for your business/product to exist, it does not deserve to exist.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah dude, there’s nothing they can do to fix this. They have eroded the trust of their users for decades. It will take them decades to get it back, if they actually tried.

      Also it took hackers days to find vulnerabilities. Which is a massive security concern.

    • arf@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Can anyone give me examples of times Windows has done this in the past? I mean, I feel like this is true, but I legit can’t think of anything that matches this.

      • odelik@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        In the last 6 months:

        • One Drive reinstalled and turned back on on my personal & work computer multiple times.
        • AI Co-pilot added to my machine and enabled “so you can start using it now!” with an obtrusive pinned shortcut on my start bar, to both of the same machines but at different time intervals. Uninstalling is virtually impossible and requires registry mods to 'remove" it. Not even a powers he’ll command can remove it.

        I don’t want, or need, this add-on garbage.