A few thousand people paying $5 per year is not enough to replace hundreds of millions.

…people or dollars? ‘Cos i don’t think “hundreds of millions” of people are chippin’ in, it’s Google that’s financing “hundreds of millions” of dollars…

But yeah, that target audience is a bubble, normies don’t care.

used chromium as the page rendering engine.

I believe WebKit is Chromium’s rendering engine, as is Gecko for Firefox.

Opera used to have their own but now they’re just rebranded Chromium.

There was a poll a while back on mastodon and the majority answered they’d be ok with 5$/year to support Firefox.

The fact that the founder commented in approval is gold.

Unsung heroes.

Scunthorpe Problem

If only one could buttassinate censorship…

Missing /s there…

Meanwhile Dave from Accounting has password123 written on a post-it on the monitor.

Oh, tariffs… i thought they were stating the obvious: christmas.

3. No shit?
4. That kinda makes sense… same strategy MS uses.
5. Is it though? Yes, i know about OpenJDK.
6. Less likely to crash, sure, it’ll just hog memory instead…
7. Aaaaah now we’re getting somewhere…
8. eeww

But this isn’t a significant issue if you’re a large financial enterprise with lots of money to hire lots of devs.

Lots of money, sure. For devs? Not really.

Unless you have a locked-down router and your ISP doesn’t allow bridge-mode.

But the status… /s

Not only nobody needs to do that trip that fast,

I’d say using “nobody” is unwarranted… some people might’ve needed at some point. Regardless, it’s not a need, it’s a want.

I’m sure executives would disagree if their companies allow for it.

Tim Roth?

Hmm… i sit corrected.

I spend time watching shit on my phone that makes me feel bad?

And coffee breaks… or banana breaks… and unions!

Let’s put them in open spaces in offices and micro-mananage then, that’ll work.