Memory is still structured like a file and referenced over addresses, we just call it something else.
Memory is still structured like a file and referenced over addresses, we just call it something else.
You sound like you’re really fun and easy to work with.
If you show me how that’s physically possible I will concede your point, but until then: No, that’s not nearly the same. You can’t just selectively block physical ads.
While the comparison may make sense when not thinking it through, print is a completely different medium than digital where comparisons only make limited sense. In this one they don’t at all.
Physical media does not track views (directly) or click through numbers, for example.
You are just self-important and cannot come to terms with reality, lol. All those creators and their content would not exist in this form, for free, without YouTube. All other platforms are locked behind a paywall.
But geniuses like you then talk down paywalls as well, because how dare they monetize their time?! You just want everything for free - be honest about it.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
They talked about it in the WAN show and they do not share that data as of a few months ago.
SponsorBlock does not change anything about the money they get from sponsorships. So no, that does not help them more than otherwise.
You’re really spending a lot of energy calling piracy not piracy.
You’re just justifying your actions. YouTube is not free to run, and the content there is not free to create. You’re a parasite.
Don’t worry, I’m as well - but be honest about it. What you’re doing, and many other gigabrains here, is just pathetic. There is a lot of corporate greed in this world, but this ain’t it.
No, that’s called nuance and honesty.
Satoshi Nakamoto is some kind of consipracy…?
Satoshi Nakamoto.
The corruption drips slowly inside as well.
Yeah, most effective illegal hackers are working for intelligence agencies or criminal organizations. The legal ones work for companies.
The ones “for the people” are very few.
Well from a professional here: It is.
A missing rate limit is a vulnerability, or a weakness, depending on the definition. You’re playing smart without having an idea of what you’re talking about. Here you go:
https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/799.html
YouTube videos are public, and as such it’s not really hacking. If you were able to download private videos, for example, it would be a vulnerability like “Improper Access Control”. It does not matter in the least whether you use an “exploit” in your definition (which is wrong) or “just increment the video ID”.
The result is a breach of confidentiality, and as such this is to be classified as a “hack”.
Meatbags gonna meatbag.
Right, because fuck paying for proper journalism. Everything must be free!
Remind me again, how does that work?
That is not overcompensation, that is risk management 101.