That’s giving them too much credit. I think they want it to be theirs.
That’s giving them too much credit. I think they want it to be theirs.
There are pictures and ads in a newspaper. This is much more minimalistic.
Driverless cars can work if enough vehicles are replaced with them. I agree that a few driverless cars in a sea of regular drivers is not optimal though.
I’d rather a simpler phone at this point. I don’t think I’ve ever looked at my phone and felt that it’s too small. I can think of other ways that I’d want phones to be more functional, like connecting to external peripherals and a monitor.
Lots of people are excited about folding phones too though, so more power to them if companies are willing to go that way.
My school taught me C and Python for what that’s worth. It was not for software development per se though. It was for physical simulation. I don’t know if that was a departmental decision or a coincidence based on my professors.
I found it on this site under the “happy” category. https://github.com/delventhalz/kaomoji-analyzer/blob/master/source_mojis.txt
For a $100k device, I would expect better long term support.
Do linux and privacy focused consumers actually make up a large portion of their market share? Linux users still make up a small portion of desktop users, and not even all of those really care much about privacy.
Where do we draw the line for “rich people?” You can’t just have a system where you can hurt and steal as much as you want from rich people. What you’re describing is closer to a revolution, and carrying that idea to its conclusion usually involves a ton of bloodshed and putting new people in power who are just as bad.
Yeah I have no sympathy for advertisers, but this seems like it’s pretty clearly fraud.
I thought that most people from here are just from various influxes of redditors.
It was going to happen eventually. It sucks since so much good content is still housed on youtube. The bright side is that I’ll probably read more when uBlock stops working so well.
They kind of have to be about making money. No company survives by putting the needs of the customer above all else, unfortunately.
I think publishers value the fact that steam is essentially a form of DRM, so we got fairly lucky all things considered. Imagine if steam didn’t exist and we had to deal with software like Uplay and Origin.
We need self tightening AI nuts and bolts. We could sell them to Boeing or something idk.
I think the villain in Law Abiding Citizen killed somebody using a trap tie of some sort.
Technically they are, but I’m not sure how confident I am in YouTube showing you comments I a reasonable order regardless.
I know it may not be an easy question to answer, but does your company really owe them money? I’m guessing that their other software that uses their JVM also has a license, so they should be more clear about the company having to license out the JVM in order to use it. This sounds like a scam that comes packaged along with some other software.
I remember when Windows 10 first came around, and people were trying to bring attention to the privacy issues in the TOS. Now it’s been widely adopted just about everywhere, and this is probably going to be the same.
You can express your opinion, but other people can criticize it. It’s just how these sites work.