I’m saying identify the bugs through review, and fix them. Just do it in a new PR unless they are critical

Sorry about the confusion. It’s not sarcasm. I’m just sick and tired of people blocking my PR because of an argument about wether the function should be called X or Y or Z or D

Yeah, I see your point. Maybe my employers are different, it’s never been an issue explaining why the ticket isn’t closed just because the PR is merged

There’s often features and bug fixes worth more than the ones introduced in the PR. I’ve yet to see bug free code just because it’s went through review and QA.

I kind of with the sentiment. Review pre merge though, but only block the merge if there are serious faults. Otherwise, merge the code and have the author address issues after the merge. Get the value to production