We always have to ask what language is it auto-completing for? If it is a strictly typed language, then existing tooling is already doing everything possible and I see no need for additional improvement. If it is non-strictly typed language, then I can see how it can get a little more helpful, but without knowledge of actual context I am not sure if it can get a lot more accurate.

Cargo is heavily used.

Your tutorial is the odd one.

Is ceramic tint different from ordinary tint?

It is cheaper to produce fish and greens of manufacturing is combining the production.

The synergy of manufacturing processes increases profits and can be sold to consumers as reduction of energy consumption.

Current AI is good at compressing knowledge.

Best job role: information assistant or virtual secretary.

Preference order is: Fast IO like SSD and mirror RAID, then RAM size, then core count and then core speed.

This is not RUST specific.

How much energy do they spend to keep this floater in place?

I recommend that you boot your distro of choice from USB and see if it works for you.

You might be surprised.

If it doesn’t work with one, try a different distribution.

I’ve used Linux with nvidia cards and didn’t have issues, but I am not very demanding.

If you read comments to the original article, it is far from new idea and some farmers have used for a long time.

I originally meant solution described here:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/using-go-as-a-scripting-language-in-linux/

With requirements like yours, just use RUST itself.

GO language can be used as scripting language on Linux.

I imagine the same approach can be used with RUST.

Downvotes shall list better headphones.

I myself have not found a better solution.

I like apple headphones and i settled on similar shaped non-apple brand at a fraction af the price, but it is lower in quality compared to apple. Microphone is crap and I stopped trying to use it. Headphones level is good at low level and high level sound reproduction, but it is not as accurate as apple.

In the end the trade off is worth it to me for the price, but i will not claim at is better.

So, bring on your alternative and price of it.

This is a major reason to use simpler technology.

I can’t help you, but i had a similar experience with similar technology. I spent lots of time recovering content. I succeeded, but i have software development experience. I didn’t want a repeat of that.

In the end I picked windows file sharing for home networking and filebrowser for occasional access to data files from outside of home networking.

Web dav is a very good alternative. Apache web server will be easier, but nginx can be made to work.

Joplin is another good alternative, which is based on web dav.

You can pay around $2-$3 a month to shared services provider for hosted web dav.