I have an even better idea: make tool creators and / or CEO of the company, using the tool, liable for all tool’s mistakes and hallucinations.

Which has the same concept as the LLM under the hood, hasn’t it?

Partially agree: money by itself do not maintain Linux. You need a man - willing and competent one.

We’ll see, whether empty positions would be filled or not.

I imagine the sanctions preventing them from working on Linux is the least of their problems

It’s even more problematic for users of Linux. Less maintainers.

for personal needs

Not effective enough, it seems.

Seems like a rather harmless fetish

It’s early morning, and Zelda Montes walks briskly through the crisp New York air as they head to Google’s headquarters on Manhattan’s 9th Avenue.

Oh my god, why put in a topic about serious matter all that fancy decorum? I immediately see a man with a bun, typing this topic in a café, not caring a single shit about real people behind the text.

A couple of times. Every time was a disaster.

Well, then you should sue them.

But it doesn’t eliminate the problem, it merely passes it to the media center PC etc

I disagree.

And boy, isn’t that true

always, it seems

Because with corporations you theoretically are able to opt out.

Of course! It’s for children and terrorists!

Why should we not make russians who support genocidal imperialism (both conceptually and as implemented by their leaders) responsible? Are they children? Of course they should pay for their actions.

How would you sort those who support war from those who don’t?

Well, it’s bad from a western POV.

Parks?

You have a hell of a love for that phrase!