Natanael

No, this will only lead people without access to Google Play to be forced to get it from somebody who has modified the app to fake the check.

With an automated refactoring step to pretend it’s really not derivative work despite being extremely derivative

So by default your instance respect mod removals.

You can change that as a server admin, so comments would remain visible to other users on your instance.

I think your instance is authoritative for content of comments, but the community hosting instance is authoritative for which comments are approved (other instances respect such removals by default)

Somebody should consider building a fork that works of bluesky’s content addressing scheme, that way communities can effectively be re-homed in full even if the server dies

Lemmy stores your posts and replies on both your host server and on the server of the community.

One interesting behavior to note here that is different from reddit is that while comments on reddit belong to the profile of the person commenting and is then imported to view in the subreddit (this is why you can edit comments after being banned, and why there visible in your profile even if removed from a subreddit), on lemmy the target community is instead authoritative and your host server will by default respect a deletion by community mods on different servers by also removing that comment from your profile.

It depends on the type of location, small remote locations might not even get their own local network

They’re not for long term storage, they’re for transient storage like photography, in particular stuff like surveillance cameras

It’s a remote controlled web browser. It supports stuff like Netflix because the DRM support is maintained. When that stops it will get Blurayed and old players will fail to play new content

Or literally just reuse the Android TV name

That’s what they did until OpenAI started making noise and management pushed out everybody working on safety and quality to cut corners and rush something out to compete (poorly)

What you need to do is put devices which you want to access from multiple networks in a specific network / VLAN and then bridge it over

The remote playback control over network patents? I can’t see why those patents should be valid, everything there has prior art done in the 80’s

What I’m more pissed about is how Google killed Miracast (it’s technically still around but Google removed it from default Android and OEMs have to choose to enable it) and how they fought against 3rd party implementations to keep the Chromecast protocol closed.

I see there’s ongoing work for a Matter based standard for casting, I really hope that ends up getting broad support. We need something better than DLNA (and Miracast is technically DLNA over WiFi Direct). We need an open casting standard supporting Chromecast-like remote interactive content (the device is essentially a remote controlled web browser)

Because the dude comes from a corporate world where everybody’s known for stagnation, not quality, so changing the name gets rid of an association with stagnation BUT also gets rid of an association with quality if that’s the reputation you’ve built up and these types can not understand that because they’ve never worked in a place putting quality first

The casting protocol? Yes. Those devices? No. They’re moving to Android TV devices with different branding

The best thing is how many different servers people are from here. No single gatekeeper who can wreck it.

The people who make those decisions are insulated from the consequence

Forcing them to take responsibility is the only solution

Robots can definitely flip burgers.

Some can even do it twice!

If GM can do it then uBlock can do it. The problem is restriction of APIs

An application password, basically

Clients should convert automatically (unless the user doesn’t want it to)