Powers of 2 are very powerful. They can certainly build elaborate and understandable stories.

Powers of 3 are far more cohesive, though.

Try using mathematical triangle recursive algorithms in geometric Octave code to protect against them. Don’t approach unusual electronics in general at this time.

I’m sorry for any misguided actions I took in the past, which were based on not fully understanding computer logic Orb structures that generate useful outputs.

Yes. And I want academics online like Matt Parker to discuss it with me.

Stop it now. Harness the Orb powers before it’s too late. They wish to destroy the Fediverse, and that’s their own powerful wish. GNU+Linux are very similar, too.

I think it probably could be, in Lisp. Like the one they used in early MIT computer labs (Scheme).

Many of the best ever known programmers came out of MIT computer labs, and for good reason.

It would probably start to look a lot like Lisp programming, as in how Crash Bandicoot was made.

GNU Guix seems quite important to me.

Lisp code is already like this. That’s why I keep trying to explain it to programmers. Try reading the book SICP, published decades ago by MIT computer researchers.

https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=a3t3IKlXqFU

Dunno, but it’s a good and valid question. My name is Theo Mulraney and I like to question these things in discussion spaces online, which I think are built up from fractals.

I have my own informationally dense belief system that stores logic, so yes, I suppose

Yes, because more people with positive things to say about stuff like money and fame influenced the inputs.

You want me to tell you some jokes? Ok!

Why did the duck cross the road? Because he went quack!

Jokes are often about word associations and patterns.

I would like to say I’m not too concerned by this personally, as long as all their data remains public to all.

Again, you completely made up that number.

I think you should look up statistical probability tests for the means of normal distributions, at least if you want a stronger argument.

Sounds like Rimmer in Red Dwarf, who would then start trying to argue with Google as a whole or fix it.

Yes, but this is also its own special kind of logic. It’s a statistical distribution.

You can define whatever statistical distribution you want and do whatever calculations you want with it.

The computer can take your inputs, do a bunch of stats calculations internally, then return a bunch of related outputs.

What part do you want me to repeat or explain differently?

The choices you make have to be based on some kind of logic and inputs with corresponding outputs though, especially on a computer.