mostly is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence. Would you like to buy my glow in the dark watch, then?

If you think toxic means harmful only if you eat it, I’ve got a glow in the dark watch to sell you.

Stop using Reddit.

My current car has a fairly large screen for media, gps, and some other in depth settings that don’t need to be addressed while driving.

The rest is physical buttons and I honestly really like that hybrid approach to this.

Without the right monitor or setup, HDR can look not great.

I mean, the HDR support and multi window snapping, as well as remembering window positions on multiple displays.

To highlight the absurdity of the concept. I think the majority of people would agree that topless men should not be censored.

That’s my point.

If women’s nipples are censored because they are considered sexual, men’s should be too. I know more than a few women who are sexuality aroused by topless men.

That’s precisely the intent behind the feature.

Cut Amazon shopping and subscriptions out of my life years ago and haven’t regretted it.

Lol no.

I meant for the person who did the blocking.

What pros are there to having a blocked person still be able to see your posts?

If they are a troll and they’ve tricked me into apologizing, I lose nothing. If they are having a really bad day and they just needed some kindness, I gain everything. No brainer, to me.

I’m sorry that I contributed to that, but please understand I could not have known ahead of time that you’re being harassed. I hope things get better for you.

My guy I just am a pedantic person, I don’t know anything about targeted harassment. I’m sorry that my comment came off as harassment, that was not my intent.

If you don’t care, that’s something you can admit. But don’t speak for everyone. I was pointing out the correct word in case you did care.

Fewer.

It is probably part of it, yeah. But to be clear I’m not a captcha expert or anything, just a layman.