Martin

Is chrome modular enough to make it feasible for Edge and other Chrome based browsers to add support for jpegxl themselves?

If you know how the code does something, you also know what it does.

You are absolutely right. It was inline comments I had in mind.

Absolutely, although I see that as part of why

Why is there a horrible hack here? Because stupid reason…

Comments should explain “why”, the code already explains “what”.

It depends on if it requires server side connection or not.

This is enough for most projects.

How does switching the codec help with downloading subtitles from the web?

Is using the Android TV app considered “using it wrong”? Because that doesn’t support downloading subtitles.

But not on the Android TV app.

But thanks anyway, I actually didn’t know that downloading subtitles was supported on other platforms. This should att least allow me to download subtitles via the phone. A bit more cumbersome than having it directly in the app as for Kodi though.

I’m also tired of Kodi but I constantly come back to it. The one thing that Kodi does better than all the rest is the handling of subtitles. I try to use Jellyfin instead but I constantly have to switch back to Kodi because there are no ways (from within the app) to find and download new subtitles.

Do we really want Facebook users just for the growth? Quality beats quantity.

I hate when I have to work with non SQL based persistence.

To each their own I guess. 😇

Why not use a compiled language that compiles to fat binaries (rust, go etc)?

I always use Bacon ipsum

That is stupid. Those commands are for different use cases.

We are over 1000 developers and use docker ce just fine. We use a self hosted repository for our images. IT is configuring new computers to use this internal docker repository by default. So new employees don’t even have to know about it to do their first docker build.

We all use Linux on our workstations and laptops. That might make it easier.