adequately explained.
The ignorance doesn’t explain where all the money comes from. So malice it is! Lol
adequately explained.
The ignorance doesn’t explain where all the money comes from. So malice it is! Lol
But so do the Stack Overflow users
Why would you want to also make Stack Overflow worse?
I thought it was a mistake/typo. Those don’t instantly become words just because a reader can guess the meaning
Wait, Elon Musk’s ex-wife is now his mother-in-law?
Elon Musk’s dad groomed Elon Musk’s step-sister, if accurate, is more clear.
Elon Musk’s dad groomed his own step daughter…lol
I think you’re having a Principal Skinner meme moment here…
Could it be me who wrote a comment that was slightly unclear?
…
No, it’s couple dozen or so other commenters who are wrong.
Lmao…if you don’t see how going “Hey it’s not actually a crime!” sounds like defending them, I can’t help you.
And “internet tough guy”? Where is that even coming from? Lol
I also think the issue was with your comment. It could’ve been written a bit more clearly
Are you defending the people who used the AI bots as described?
instead of knowing someone in the neighborhood is researching how to get away with murder.
…how would I know that?
I thought they were mostly bots and alts
It’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car
That was the one action I took on Twitter after creating an account before my account got banned.
I needed to create an account to check a local source for updates. So I did. I also decided to look around on Twitter to see what I was “missing”. Saw a bunch of Musk stuff and instantly knew I didn’t want to see any of it. So I blocked him.
In a few weeks, when I clicked a Twitter link, it said my account had been banned for suspicious activity. It had a secure password and this was its second log-in ever (no posts, comments, reactions, etc).
The post title was an entire thought in the form of a question. It invited people to come and share their opinions.
Not to mention that in many clients, the title is presented first before the post body. So someone could come up with their answer after reading everything initially presented to them about this post.
Also, skimming is a useful thing that people do, lol
Upvoted for “Panda’s box”…lmao!
It is kind of misleading to leave it out of the title and hide it in the middle of the post. “Besides AI” could’ve easily fit in the post title.
I think you’re missing the key part of the problem. It isn’t the AI that’s the issue.
The problem is that he was being paid for how many listeners his AI songs got. But he used bots to “listen” to the songs. Nobody actually listened to his AI music.
The flaw in the system was that they couldn’t detect his bots. (And the bots are not AI)
I didn’t say that it is.
But to your second point, as others have mentioned, body image issues are likely the biggest reason for the change discussed in the OP.
There’s a difference between a claim and conjecture