I don’t understand why all these chrome derivatives and firefox don’t just band together and extend manifest v3 with some vendored standardised extension that addresses the limitations.

Browsers do that for CSS and JavaScript features already. An extension could just check if the browser supports the “unlimited filters” option and use it if its available.

I have never researched it but heard that the permissions of manifest v3 are much better for privacy.

I am in favor of removing manifest v2 if the vendored extension becomes a reality.

Browsers already have too much complexity, lines of code and feature creep.

My personal theory for the curved edges is, that samsung just wanted to prevent cheap off brand replacement screens.

I have searched for alternatives. There are none that I am aware of. I just want a streaming box that can run jellyfin with a simple remote. I really don’t want to use a keyboard in bed.

If anyone knows a simple setup that boots straight into jellyfin with a remote, I would love to hear about it.

So you would need buffer barrieres essentially.

Still user watches video. Ad avoidance skips forward to buffer barrier to play ad in the background. Streamed ad is thrown away and new buffer data is received. User does not notice if the video is long enough.

In this case the buffer limit is the metadata.

Well the player and its controls are client side.

I think dd is the right tool for the job. Consider using pv though. It can be much much faster.

I have a samsung tv from 2016 and it always lags terribly when switching inputs. Sometimes the menu takes 20 seconds to load. What is it doing?

The biggest offenders for me are:

• I struggle to navigate and make out alle the controls of the settings app. Somehow finding the settings visually is very difficult.
• The new settings app is single instance. The control panel had lots of popup windows and you could open it multiple times which allowed parallel open settings windows.

It’s like spectre and meltdown you also lost the advertised performance. Less performance is better than a gaping security hole or a broken chip.

Take a look at tubearchivisit. Works great and is in development.

And clearnet use is very difficult through Tor. Exit node ips are flagged and you have impossible captchas on many sites.

Sonarr prowlarr radarr and many more. These are very powerful media download managers. I recommend using usenet.

One router (opnsense) a big Poe switch and unifi aps made a huge difference. Also wiring Ethernet everywhere helped a lot.

Previously we had devolo mesh plugs.

What kind of firewall do you have that can handle that amount of bandwidth?

Ahh nice good to know. For my use case I’d rather not distribute the certificates to all my services.

My memory sticks are all DDR4 with 32GB@2133MT/s.

Each card has 24GB so 48GB vram total. I use ollama it fills whatever vrams is available on both cards and runs the rest on the CPU cores.

My specs because you asked:

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5-2699 v3 (72) @ 3.60 GHz
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla P40 [Discrete]
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P40 [Discrete]
GPU 3: Matrox Electronics Systems Ltd. MGA G200EH
Memory: 66.75 GiB / 251.75 GiB (27%)
Swap: 75.50 MiB / 40.00 GiB (0%)

What are you asking exactly?

What do you want to run? I assume you have a 24GB GPU and 64GB host RAM?

I regularly run llama3 70b unqantized on two P40s and CPU at like 7tokens/s. It’s usable but not very fast.