Temperature is measured in Farads.
Very non-standard
Disclaimer: I don’t represent KDE in any interaction with this account. I am just freeloading off of the kde.social server.
Temperature is measured in Farads.
Very non-standard
Next Up
Windows Server license on MS Windows Activation server has expired…
Dungeon Party
DisplayPort not to be confused with display port, when someone asks you for a “display port cable” and you start going to pick one of VGA/HDMI/DVI cables instead.
On desktop PCs, Depending upon the Motherboard manufacturer and model series, it could either mean nothing other than some gaming marketing jargon or…
When a motherboard has both red and blue ports, the Red ones could be those connected directly to the CPU lanes for USB, with the blue ones being routed through the PCH.
If there is just one red coloured USB A port, it might be designated for BIOS updates (unless they have another colour for that).
What if they got hashed by that cobalt system :P
I’ve seen people good at typing on a touch screen and they do so, astonishingly well. I myself, am not able to type on touch well enough and just use swype instead (despite the frustration).
Swype typing can get pretty fast tbh. But that greatly depends upon the software.
Despite the hate it got, Windows Phone’s default keyboard had a far superior swype experience as compared to Android and iOS. Probably because they didn’t try to inculcate all user words into their dictionary and used the sentence structure as a reference to rank the predicted words.
Had this one been OSS, it would have been a great service. But now it has been scrapped along with the rest of Windows Phone. One of the reasons why I hate to think of what would happen to any high effort thing I make in a company.
And more de-obf:
#include <stdio.h>
const char addarr1[]
= { 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40,
0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0,
0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40,
0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40,
0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40,
0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x0, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40,
0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40,
0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x0,
0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40,
0x0, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40,
0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0,
0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x0, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0,
0x40, 0x40, 0x40, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0 };
const char addarr2[]
= { 0x9, 0x26, 0x20, 0x39, 0x2f, 0x35, 0x32, 0x20, 0x2c, 0x2f, 0x36, 0x25,
0x20, 0x2c, 0x25, 0x34, 0x34, 0x25, 0x32, 0x20, 0x29, 0x33, 0x2e, 0x27,
0x34, 0x20, 0x27, 0x29, 0x36, 0x25, 0x2e, 0x20, 0x29, 0x2e, 0x20, 0x34,
0x28, 0x25, 0x20, 0x26, 0x2f, 0x32, 0x2d, 0x20, 0x2f, 0x26, 0x20, 0x28,
0x29, 0x27, 0x28, 0x2c, 0x39, 0x20, 0x2f, 0x22, 0x26, 0x35, 0x33, 0x23,
0x21, 0x34, 0x25, 0x24, 0x20, 0x3, 0x2c, 0x20, 0x29, 0x33, 0x20, 0x29,
0x34, 0x20, 0x32, 0x25, 0x21, 0x2c, 0x2c, 0x39, 0x20, 0x21, 0x20, 0x2c,
0x2f, 0x36, 0x25, 0x20, 0x2c, 0x25, 0x34, 0x34, 0x25, 0x32, 0x3f, 0xa,
0x9, 0x20, 0x24, 0x2f, 0x2e, 0x27, 0x34, 0x20, 0x2b, 0x2e, 0x2f, 0x37,
0x2c, 0x20, 0x22, 0x35, 0x34, 0x20, 0x37, 0x28, 0x21, 0x34, 0x20, 0x9,
0x20, 0x24, 0x2f, 0x20, 0x2b, 0x2e, 0x2f, 0x37, 0x20, 0x29, 0x33, 0x20,
0x34, 0x28, 0x21, 0x34, 0x20, 0x9, 0x20, 0x2c, 0x2f, 0x36, 0x25, 0x20,
0x39, 0x2f, 0x35, 0x21, 0x20, 0x3c, 0x33, 0xa };
int main ()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 152; i++)
{
char adder1 = addarr1[i];
char adder2 = addarr2[i];
char to_print = (char)adder1 + adder2;
printf ("%c", to_print);
}
return 63;
}
I guess I should have kept the recursion and straightened it out in the next step, but now that it’s done…
The next step will just have an array of the characters that would be printed, so I’ll leave it here.
Here’s it with some amount of de-obfuscation:
#include <stdio.h>
short i = 0;
const long b[]
= { 0xd60, 0x3200, 0x1ca8, 0x74e2, 0x9c, 0x66e8, 0x5100, 0x14500,
0x63b8, 0x49c6, 0xe0, 0x6200, 0x75e8, 0x57a6, 0xe8, 0x4300,
0x4500, 0x63b8, 0x49ea, 0xc6, 0x548e, 0x22, 0x75e8, 0x57a6,
0xc6, 0x2fae, 0x7486, 0x8a, 0xd72, 0x4f9c, 0x63c6, 0x4ea2,
0x809c, 0x66e8, 0x5100, 0x5c00, 0x71a2, 0x51b8, 0x4e9e, 0xc6,
0x6200, 0x70c4, 0x8022, 0x7d00, 0x439c, 0x63b8, 0x6ae0, 0x54c0,
0x47e8, 0xe2, 0x5192, 0x6fc4, 0x4900, 0x60e8, 0x100ca, 0x14fe8,
0x6000, 0x44e92, 0x6300, 0x57c4, 0xae, 0x4ecc, 0x62de, 0xc6,
0xafae, 0x70c4, 0x9e, 0x4ec6, 0x639c, 0x5100, 0x4ecc, 0x74a2,
0x9e, 0x54e8, 0x7100, 0x608a };
const long n = 9147811012615426336;
long
main ()
{
if (i < 152)
{
char shifter;
if (i % 2 == 0)
{
shifter = 8;
}
else
{
shifter = 1;
}
char adder1 = (b[i >> 1] >> shifter) & 64;
char adder2 = (n >> (b[i >> 1] >> shifter)) & 63;
char to_print = (char)adder1 + adder2;
i++;
main ();
printf ("%c", to_print);
}
return 63;
}
Needless to say, the return value doesn’t matter any more. So you can change it to 0
or 69
depending upon your preferences.
Some kind of Caesar cipher you made?
fIy uo rolevl teet rsi’n tigev nnit ehf ro mfoh gilh yboufcstadeC ,sii terlayla l vo eelttre ? Iod’n tnkwo ,ub thwtaI d onkwoi shttaI l vo eoy!u< 3%
You get all Lemmy results! Yaay!
Sorry, that’s really all there’s to it.
Try searching Google for “Saganumenousness”
Your machine translation is working well.
Now just if we had all famous people saying stuff like this.
But they won’t. Guess why? Because the “won’t” is what made them famous (and rich),
Lay people give more heed to those acting from the start, like they have the answers. That’s what “charisma” is about.
Also one of the reasons why religion gets easier wins. Because when people hear something that makes them have to think more, they ignore it more.
What law is being broken here?
The law of “don’t take money from the rich and powerful; only they take their your money”.
I would never go back to doing those little chores to get a grade.
So either you have finished obtaining all the academic certifications that require said chores, or you are going to fail at getting a grade.
You were allowed a page “cheat sheet” to use on the exams, and the exams were pretty much the same problems with the numbers changed.
That seems like the worst way of making an exam.
In case the cheat sheet were not there, it would at least be testing something (i.e. how many formulae you memorised), albeit useless.
When you let students have a cheat sheet, it is supposed to be obvious that this will be a HOTS (higher order thinking skills) test. Well, maybe for teachers lacking said HOTS, it was not obvious.
I was making a shared library at work and was recently asked to start throwing exceptions, because the users wouldn’t care to check my returned error and just continue with the empty returned data.
Well, now they will most probably have an empty catch block and continue doing what they did before.
Nothing can fix a lazy worker.
Anti Commercial-AI license