It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    you could, but the connotations of master/slave have been integrated heavily over the years, and changing it willy nilly doesn’t really accomplish much since we’re talking about moving electrons through wires, or light through glass. So i don’t think anybody really cares about it at the end of the day.

    Realistically though, very little designed architectures these days operate on a master slave meta. At best there’s one “primary” and several “secondary” or “follower” nodes behind it. Or some kind of democratically elected process for handling that.