• Shanedino@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sure two additional cases not that bad, now just keep adding them up. Like anything security related it’s not 100% perfect you just have to make it annoying to break.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Meanwhile mathematicians working on cryptography: the universe will die before you get even 10% chance of cracking encryption.

        Security by obscurity is no security.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          No. Security through obscurity is bad security, but it’s still an additional layer. And since there’s literally no way to 100% ensure that a machine is being controlled by a human, there’s literally no other way except saying “fuck it” and not doing any security at all.

      • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Security by design is 100% perfect. Security by obscurity is far from it