EDIT: I didn’t notice in the original post, the article is from 2023

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19707239

Researchers have documented an explosion of hate and misinformation on Twitter since the Tesla billionaire took over in October 2022 – and now experts say communicating about climate science on the social network on which many of them rely is getting harder.

Policies aimed at curbing the deadly effects of climate change are accelerating, prompting a rise in what experts identify as organised resistance by opponents of climate reform.

Peter Gleick, a climate and water specialist with nearly 99,000 followers, announced on May 21 he would no longer post on the platform because it was amplifying racism and sexism.

While he is accustomed to “offensive, personal, ad hominem attacks, up to and including direct physical threats”, he told AFP, “in the past few months, since the takeover and changes at Twitter, the amount, vituperativeness, and intensity of abuse has skyrocketed”.

  • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    198
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    I have no clue why all these normal, non-racist non-political people still use twitter. It was bought for the obvious purpose of providing a safe space for conservatives, racists, incels, and other outcasts to society. Mastodon is a perfect replacement for it, and you can pick an instance that suits you. It isn’t owned by a mentally unstable billionaire!

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I agree with this assessment for the most part but one side of me plays devil’s advocate on this:

      I sort of came to realize in the end that it was possibly purchased to push all leftists off the platform, allowing Musk to compete with Google and Facebook in heavily manipulating and censoring discourse in American society (and let’s be clear, they did. Just because it was an attempt to help “the good guys in the DNC” by Google and Facebook doesn’t make it not an open and shut case of treasonous manipulation of discourse.

      As an absolutely prolific Twitter user pre-2016, I was very quick to leave….but at the same time, I eventually came to the sad conclusion that Xitter (pronounced Shitter) actually does need leftist voices as long as it exists. IMO, it (and Google and Facebook) should be dissolved, open sourced, decentralized, and socialized for the crime of treason/undermining democracy.

      We (people of the fediverse with a strong sense of integrity) basically fled to our own decentralized, open source platform where we have 1 millionth of the reach with our voices. Being around such a cesspool where astroturfers working for Progressive think tanks and their conservative buddies would gaslight me about the popularity of things like Single Payer or student loan reform…which was not great for my well-being…But let’s not pretend that leftists that remain on the platform are bad people for doing so. An echo chamber has a way of brainwashing people. So, conservatism would be even stronger had more of our brethren not stayed.

      Just a small counterpoint. I strongly dislike conservatism and the conservative ethos of “fuck you, got mine”…but perhaps they were playing 4D chess with us a bit.

          • Traister101@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Everyone from the lemmy.blahaj.zone instance that I’ve interacted with or seen have been trolls. Those guys are super weirdos idk what their deal is. It’s baffling seeing what they claim to stand for

            • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I thought they were supposed to be a pro-trans, inclusive community but I’m thinking it’s mostly just astro-terfing trolls. Kinda like ml or lemmygrad or beehaw aren’t really leftists, just pro-authoritarian incoherent apologist edgelords.

              It’s like they’re not even trying to interact with good faith.

                • harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  29 days ago

                  Well, beehaw is kinda like ml but less hinged at times. I don’t block instances, only users and communities. Some of beehaws communities are quite good and friendly. The politics ones…well, I don’t see those anymore.

                  Sometimes it feels like there grownups in there who grasp nuance and empathy and at other times it feels like it’s full of ex-4channers who think they’ve grown up.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_effect

      Twitter hasn’t dropped below the critical mass of users necessary for the system to become useless. It’s still a major artery of media and social commerce, just one that’s been littered with landmines. Yes, its far more dangerous and difficult to navigate now, but its still better than posting into the uninhabited wilderness that is Bluesky or the exact same basket of shitty engagement posts that is Threads.

      • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Counterpoint: Twitter will continue to maintain a critical mass of users until enough people move somewhere else to make it irrelevant. Continuing to use it only serves to further credentialize the platform, making it even less likely that users will find a new home someplace else.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Continuing to use it only serves to further credentialize the platform

          The vast majority of users don’t care whether the platform is credentialized or not.

          • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            Respectfully, you were the one who pointed out the impact of the Network Effect.

            The adoption of a product by an additional user can be broken into two effects: an increase in the value to all other users (total effect) and also the enhancement of other non-users’ motivation for using the product (marginal effect).

            Thus, users don’t need to understand the credentials of the platform if the network effect is strong enough, but as users leave the network, the value (credentials) of the platform as a whole decreases.

            Another way to think about it is that the amount Twitter “matters” is directly related to how much we collectively agree it matters. While not directly transferable, I’d suggest that Keynes’ Animal Spirits concept can help us to understand why this might be the case - prevailing attitudes towards a platform can have a profound impact on their value.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Is it actually better than nothing though?

        Either these are tolerant folks or someone we might be better off if they stayed on 4twitter.

    • nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s still usable if you’re not on English side of Twitter.

      For example, recent Indonesian political movement relied on Twitter for discussion and updates. Mastodon or any fediverse is simply too niche and most people don’t have money to fund local general instance. There were several local fedi instance (Mastodon and Lemmy), but all of them quickly dead for low donation.

      Japanese-side is still alive (in positive manner) but people are making backup account on Bluesky and Japanese Misskey instances.

    • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Idk either. But it’s really easy to stay where you’re used to, rather than do the work to set something new up

    • _sideffect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Very true, but at the same time I feel that it’s a place where I won’t get censored just because google randomly thought my comment was offensive

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh, i didnt know this was like IT. i’ll tell my russians friends just to ignore putin’s regime

      • Eximius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        If by ignore, you mean stop paying taxes and working in any capacity for government in one go, yes would work. The only fear is being singled out, if more than 0.5% of the people do it, army wont even have the guts to get tanks out, they will join.

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Touché

          Venezuela has ~70% of the people against the regime, (nearly 90% counting the 5M that were not allowed to vote) and the needle isn’t even moving.

          And in Russia being “singled out” is apparently a national tradition.

          Sorry, I may be over pessimistic today.

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            I guess that’s a fair example. But logically sounds impossible for such control over the population to be had. If a group went out to the streets to oust the government, you would say at least maybe 45% would join.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          No. Dunno where did you take that 0.5% from, it’s not empirically confirmed by anything.

          Like 20% if you want to see civil war. Like 40% if you want to see regime change.

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            There is the semi-usually-known research that suggests 3.5% is enough for non-violent protests to reach changes. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7312/chen15682

            0.5% is 1 in 200 people, essentially everyone knowing personally one person who is against the government. Maybe it isn’t enough.

            But also, 0.5% homogenously (instead of country-wide being concentrated in Moscow), would be 600k people peacefully marching in Moscow streets

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              It doesn’t work. It’s some urban legend that this is sufficient. Even those 600k may or may not be stopped by a threat of real ammo being used. I’m not even talking about coordination.

              One can “prove” anything with selectively chosen statistics.

              • Eximius@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                They werent selectively chosen. " An original, aggregate data set of all known major nonviolent and violent resistance campaigns from 1900 to 2006 is used to test these claims." As well as any researcher who isn’t a complete buffoon would only look at statistics that has only a 2-3 sigma chance of only being stochastic noise.

                • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  The set of indicators, of course, was selectively chosen. The authors, of course, have decided which of these they consider important and which don’t, that is, decided upon weights and criteria.

      • tourist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        Pardon my ignorance. I may have a mild brain injury.

        Could you perhaps rephrase?

        I’m not sure if I understood what you said.

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          In IT (the movie and, i presume, also in the book) ::: spoiler spoiler The kids realize that IT feeds on attention and that the only way to fight it is by ignoring it :::

          Imo, shitter (X) is a cesspool as it is now, but I dont believe that leaving it to the hordes is a solution to anything. We need a better approach to deal with this people.

          • tourist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Ah, that makes sense. I thought you meant IT as in information technology. Was very confused.

            Brain still good yey

            edit: typo. perhaps I need to make that appointment

  • Dave field@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We should as a community ensure Twitter\X lives forever…

    If only as a place to keep certain social media users “entertained”

    In all seriousness it does concern me how often I see such a wide variety of news agencies quote Twitter considering the amount of hate that goes on there

    • xenoclast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The irony of climate scientists ignoring a problem and waiting until it’s far to late to do something is honestly pretty funny…

      At this point it’s wholly on you if you’re still using twitter.

      You’d think smart people like science nerds would have left the Nazi bar ages ago.

    • ansiz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s because the news media industry as a whole has stuck with Twitter as their primary social media site. It’s kinda hilarious how much they seem to like it and how much time they spend there.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s dangerous. Look at what Fox is doing, as an entertainment company, to US politics across the country.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    1 month ago

    Considering Meta is doubling down on disinformation, more people should go to Mastodon and Bsky over Threads or Twitter.