Alpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agoLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1916arrow-down133
arrow-up1883arrow-down1imageLadies and Gentlemen, the sate of AI.lemmy.worldAlpha71@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square108fedilink
minus-squaresugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·14 days agoSure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
minus-squarecriticon@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 days agoThe AI response reads like when you are looking for something in Reddit and you get 3 very different responses in 3 different threads about the same topic
minus-squareWrench@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·14 days agoYep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context. The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.
Sure, but AI didn’t say that. It said: XTX > XT, get XT.
The AI response reads like when you are looking for something in Reddit and you get 3 very different responses in 3 different threads about the same topic
Yep, my comment was tongue in cheek. It’s a useless result and only sort of makes sense as an overly reduced summary that has lost vital context.
The other reply is the obvious answer. Each answer is from a different viewpoint from a different user.