• 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I wouldn’t call them ‘better’ alternatives. They’re easier to install for sure. Personally, I’ve used revanced, newpipe, and libretube and love them all. I stuck with newpipe, since that’s what my family uses now, and it’s easier to troubleshoot when I have it too. And revanced takes some steps, more than just “install this package, done”.

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          And revanced takes some steps, more than just “install this package, done”.

          It depends. Personally I patch it and then share the patched apk with friends and family, so for them it’s literally just “install this package, done” without compromising security.

          • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            just make sure you either install it for them or let them know to only install this app not any app. getting them in the habit of installing any apk from email/text is bad news bears

            • Rinox@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Tbh I share an apk twice a year on a shared Whatsapp group and that’s all the “maintaining” I do, so I don’t care that much. I’ve had worse

              • Pika@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                not gonna lie, a little envious that your family knows how to install from apk, that would be my first bottleneck. They would hit the first scare screen and raise the white flag

        • Noxious@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d say they are objectively better, because are independent, free & open source apps, instead of relying on patching Google’s proprietary software.

          • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            2 months ago

            They aren’t better IF you enjoy most of YouTubes features. Usability is key, and messing around with Revanced manager twice a year has been worth it easily.

            Being OS doesn’t suddenly make worse UX better.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            I appreciate your viewpoint, as it’s a part of what makes the software development community so great. I don’t necessarily agree with it, personally, since they all rely on proprietary backend (YouTube), but I truly do appreciate it.

            • Noxious@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              I just don’t want any proprietary software on my devices (for many reasons, most importantly privacy and user freedom). I can use a VPN to privately connect to the YouTube backend, but things get much harder when the proprietary spyware is actually on my device.

              • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t disagree with this point. Calling them objectively better however, is not covering the whole story imo. They are objectively better if your goal is to deproprietarize (not a real word) as much as possible. But if your goal is to just block ads as seamlessly as possible while still keeping all other features in YouTube, then those FOSS apps drop to subjectively better.

                • Noxious@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Well yeah, I agree. FOSS apps do lack features like logging in (to a Google account), the recommendation algorithm, etc. On the other hand, ReVanced is not exactly easy to install for new users. Both approaches are valid and get the job done (blocking annoying ads). I appreciate the calm and pleasant conversation.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Which one of those do I pick if I actually want to be logged in and have Youtube keep track of my watch history, automatically synchronized between devices?

            • Noxious@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you want to use YouTube for that, it seems like ReVanced is your only option. But you can also create an account on a Piped instance, and have your playlists synced. LibreTube is the only app that supports this.

            • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Revanced with MicroG. I use YouTube 50/50 on mobile and Shield (SmartTube) and if my watch history, subscriptions etc. didn’t work, I wouldn’t be using it.

      • littlewonder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Now do Android TV! All I want is to be able to allowlist channels for my kids but block everything else. I know an htpc is a better option but I’m lazy.

    • saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      SmartTube is so good. You get it for no ads; you keep it for all the dope features. It’s like YT way back in the day with more advanced shit for anyone that loves tinkering with all the fiddly bits.

    • HeyListenWatchOut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      iOS DID have Yattee, but it’s basically unusable at this point unless I’m doing something terribly wrong on my end. Every time I try to use it, even when signed in, I get errors no matter which back end I use.

        • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Brave can also block YT ads, but I’m not so sure about the extensions. If all you care about is blocking ads, brave is good enough. If you care about sponsorblock and many other FF extensions, Orion is probably way better.

      • Noxious@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        It doesn’t work, because it relies on Piped/Invidious. Both are currently broken, because Google is trying everything to block third party clients/APIs/proxies for YouTube.

    • zanyllama52@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I run:

      Android: LibreTube

      PC: Freetube (w/ Firefox redirect plugin)

      AndroidTV: SmartTubeNext

      This is literally the only way I will view content on YouTube.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 months ago

    They have actually started serving ads with a skip button… That only skips to the next ad.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s been a thing for years now like back before I got premium which was at least 4 years ago the skip button would skip the first ad and then bring you into a timed ad afterward that you couldn’t skip, was obnoxious as hell

      • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I got premium

        Don’t expect things to improve after happily paying consecutive ransoms.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          it’s improved for me, as someone who easily watches 20ish hours of video a week It’s worth it for me to not have to deal with all the hassle of ad block on it. I run a pihole for everything else but the cat and mouse game got old. I currently get my money’s worth, but if it raises much further I’ll cancel.

          • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            Not “if” but “when”. They have you and million others on the hook and already plan their next step to extract more money from you.

            • Pika@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              yea and when that happens I just cancel, then I can worry about all the ad blocking and stuff, but currently it’s worth it for me

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This presents a good demonstration of what we can expect Alphabet / Google / Youtube to do if ever it should win its war on adblockers, or convince people to watch YouTube without vetting. Any time it promises to compromise and make a tolerable user experience, it will ratchet up advertisement plugs until it becomes intolerable.

    This is why we can’t relent, ever.

  • toynbee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not only is this true and annoying, but other things about the ads are getting worse, too.

    I recently had to factory reset my TV and, after the first time I opened the YouTube app, immediately had to find the “don’t play video preview” option. It worked, except for the huge banner ad at the top of the list of videos, which still saw fit to play with deafening sound when I didn’t immediately change the video selection. I can’t find a setting to disable this.

    Also, I’ve noticed the “fewer ads for this long video” message popping up during videos longer than thirty minutes (and now it seems like longer than twenty minutes). Not only is that message condescending like they’re doing me a favor, but I’m pretty sure it’s not true, at least not by much; and the ads are definitely longer and mostly unskippable.

    Like someone else says in this thread, it feels like extortion.

  • texasspacejoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    It wouldn’t be so bad if they actually had ad breaks instead of stopping my video mid sente… SHAVE YOUR BALLS WITH MANSCAPE… nce

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s funny because I only hear about ads now from you guys. I never see them myself.

    Using freetube on a Linux media player connected to my TV and Newpipe on the phone.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I like to open multiple tabs on what I’m going to watch next, and Freetube is a bit clunky with the window management (I wish they had tabs!). So far uBlock has been doing an impeccable job…but these days I can see it struggling a bit more. I can see youtube REALLY tries to give me an ad first, sometimes when you open the video, you can see the first frame of an ad instead of the thumbnail while it starts buffering, then it skips to the video. The ad is not shown, but the first frame of an ad sometimes escapes into the video while it buffers at the beginning, for a second.

    • GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      How did you get newpipe to work? It’s been broken for me for like the past 3 weeks.

      • TeutonenThrasher@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Latest NewPipe 0.27.2 installed from F-Droid is able to play videos for me. But you might also try PipePipe or Tubular, which I mostly use these days.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        It was broken for a day but there was an update on f Droid. Just installed that and it’s been fine.

      • Celestus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Come on man, you’re breaking the echo chamber. We’re here to shit on Google, not give them more money

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m happy he pays, keeps Google happy enough to not care too much about people who won’t.

  • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah, it’s bad…… I didn’t feel like login into my premium account the other day and it was kinda much…….

    I am hoping we get a Democrat to in office this year. With the balls(Well she technically does not have balls; but you get my drift) to break some FUCKING monopolies up. We need to break up Ma Bell again

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Harris is married to the brother of an Uber executive. If you were hoping for a trust-buster, you picked the wrong candidate. Those $500k/plate fundraising dinners she hosts are coming entirely out of the Silicon Valley mega-millionaire bracket.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    I experienced this crazy onslaught of advertising to the point of reducing how much I watched YouTube. I was pretty upset and not at all inclined to pay, especially since YouTube was even putting ads on my own videos without me seeing a single cent, because my channel is too small.

    Then my partner bought me a few months of a Premium Subscription as a Christmas gift.

    It was pointed out to me that I watched more YouTube than any other streaming service which I was paying for.

    Combined with background music on mobile, it’s changed my life.

    I’m still unimpressed with the business model, but the alternative is so far worse.

    Find me a self publishing video platform with the reach of YouTube that doesn’t require self hosting and I’ll happily move my content there.

    • Strider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      To me this is way too much like extortion. The more they do this the less I want to give them money.

      Also I need to be logged on everywhere, which I don’t want to (have to), mostly for privacy and data harvesting reasons.

      It also does not help that when I want to see something and jump around in a video, I get the same ad 30 times. No exaggeration.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing is… All the premium features USED TO BE FREE AND AVAILABLE UNTIL THEY LOCKED THEM BEHIND A PAY WALL.

      I used to be able to have YouTube playing in the background, reduced ads, etc. All of the features.

      Now, I still do because I use Firefox + ublock on mobile. Yeah, I can play this shit with my screen off (Firefox + unlock + desktop mode + turn screen off).

      Fuck 'em.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It was pointed out to me that I watched more YouTube than any other streaming service which I was paying for.

      Yeah, I think that YouTube provides a lot of value.

      My problem is that I don’t really want Google – a company who makes a lot of their money via profiling and data-mining – logging and data-mining everything I watch.

      YouTube Premium lets someone avoid ads. But as best I can tell, it’s not buying any kind of no-log service – in fact, it’s just linking your activity to your financial information, which makes logging and profiling easier. That’s not the service that I want to buy from Google.

      What I’d be willing to get from Google is a “no log” service.

      I pay for Kagi, for search engine service. I pay for commercial email service. I’m fine with giving money to online service providers and entrusting them with (some) of my data…but I want part of that service to be that they aren’t logging what I do and data-mining my data.

      I don’t like the model of “we don’t charge up front but we make our money by extracting all the information about you that we can”. I’m fine with that existing, because some people are more comfortable with that. But it isn’t what I want for myself.

      • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think that every single provider tracks your activity and the vast majority of them use it to optimise their service income from you, either by giving you better engagement, ie. making you use the service more - endless searching for content for example, or by selling the captured tracking data to the highest bidder.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not Kagi if you believe their privacy policy. I believe them and have been loving Kagi for like a year now I think. I made the switch long ago and it’s so good I forgot about Google search.

    • cobysev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Find me a self publishing video platform with the reach of YouTube that doesn’t require self hosting and I’ll happily move my content there.

      Nebula is the next best thing to YouTube, but not enough content creators have moved their stuff there, so it’s easy to run out of interesting videos to watch after a while. Some of the bigger folks I follow share their content on both platforms, and the incentive to watch on Nebula instead of YouTube is that content creators have more freedom with their videos on Nebula. They can post bonus/extra footage that would be automatically flagged and blocked by YouTube normally. Don’t need to dance around the censors on Nebula.

      Nebula is subscription-based, so they don’t show ads anywhere on their site. But if you don’t want to pay for another subscription service, you can also do a one-time payment to have lifetime access to their site. It’s $300, which is the cost of just over 4 years of their subscription service ($6/mo). Considering I’ve had an account for over 3 years now, it’s almost paid for itself.

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        No offense to nebula (I’m rooting for them) but unless you exclusively watch news and educational content it basically has nothing to offer. I tried it for a year and I ended up barely using it because I don’t watch that type of content.

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, like I said, it needs more content creators to dump their libraries there. It could be a fantastic competitor to YouTube if only more people knew about it and used it.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The lifetime access option shouldn’t exist for an app like that, not unless they have another primary form of income (usually ads). That type of service costs a lot of money to host and if you have a user base that does a one off purchase you stop having a good chunk of that income relatively fast

        That’s just the main red flag I see from that, I would be super hesient starting on a platform that isn’t self sustaining and doesn’t have a parent company willing to chuck money at it “till it works” like Google did

        • cobysev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think it’s great for a ground-floor investment in a YouTube competitor. It draws more people to the platform, gets a chunk of money flowing up front to help boost the service, and they can always sunset the lifetime option if the site gets popular and revenue starts to get tight. As long as they continue to honor it for everyone who paid initially.

          Like I said in my original comment, a Nebula subscription is only $6/mo. A lifetime access payment is over 4 years of subscriptions up front. That’s a nice chunk of change to help get them established.

          I saw someone’s video about how Nebula works (I think Legal Eagle? He was advertising it hardcore on YouTube for a while) and the subscription service is how they pay content creators. He said it’s a more stable income than YouTube, where your videos earn advertising money based on trends and visibility. If you’re not YouTube famous (and the algorithm doesn’t make you visible), you’re not going to make any money on the platform. But Nebula gives you a more solid income, plus the freedom to make the content you want. No AI moderators flagging videos because it thought it detected the word “suicide” or something. No forcing you to include key words or pushing regular videos on a tight schedule to ensure the algorithm keeps recommending your channel.

          • Pika@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree that it’s a great investment, and it will definitely get people on board for if the platform really takes off. I think they’re definitely assuming that the majority of their people who pay the $400 aren’t going to remain on the platform which is probably a safe bet, once they get somewhat established and have content that’s more for the everyday person, I would probably recommend converting the lifetime license over to an extended long-term subscription.

            So like a subscription that lasts five six years at like the price of 3 years of the monthly subscription price, I know if YouTube offered something like that I 1,000% would buy it in a heartbeat because I know that YouTube will still be around in that time frame and it’s a no-brainer cuz I use it daily,

            That being said if they did end up having a significant amount of people that are still using the lifetime subscription, they may revert to adding features to the monthly subscriptions like how Discord does that entice you to switch to a new plan with a retroactive sub and then you just can’t switch back again.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    They’ve even started having “next” instead of “skip” so it just goes to another ad. But the worst is when it gives you an unstoppable 90 second ad roll, comes back to the video for all of 2 seconds and starts yet another 90 second ad roll.

    If I want to watch YouTube on the bigger screen now, I just open it in Firefox on my VR headset.

    • towerful@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve had it return from ads, make the video playback stutter. I refresh/reload or whatever, jump back in, get more ads, video playback stutter. It’s annoying as fuck

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I have that issue when watching on Firefox (no matter the device). Always have to reload the video to get the frame rate back in sync otherwise it looks like it’s playing at sub 24fps making even a live action video look like the Spider-Verse movie animation.

        • towerful@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh, this is on android yt app.
          Pixel 8pro, so Google & Google.
          There isn’t any variable that they don’t have control of.
          Video playback after ads skips 500ms, plays 500ms, skips 500ms etc. Changing quality doesn’t fixing it. Play/pause doesn’t fix it, skipping doesn’t fix it. I have to fully quit YT app and restart it to get playback again, and chances are it starts the ads again.
          Never had an issue on FF, w10 or Linux.

          I get that streaming video is expensive for bandwidth. And creators need an incentive to create.
          I don’t expect it for free. I don’t YT enough to warrant a premium subscription.
          The ads literally break the platform for me.
          Makes sense to me to get into one of the alternative clients… But I don’t want to not pay my dues… It’s just not worth the £13 a month: there is no way I’m consuming that much content.

    • gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      i used to do this trick to skip ads on the tv app, where i’d go to the report section and click ‘return to video’ but i abused it too much so they took away the report button entirely for me :[

  • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m going to show this real quick and then we’re going to move on, so pause the video if you want to take a closer look…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 months ago

      Phone: rings
      Me: “better pause Youtube so that I can answer without noise in the background”
      Youtube: plays ad with even louder audio
      Me:

      • chaosCruiser@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Better switch to some horror film murder compilation video before answering the phone. At least I know it’s going to be all screams and blood splattering on the walls while I’m talking on the phone.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    A bit of a PSA for LG owners running webOS:

    https://www.webosbrew.org/

    I rooted my tv and now have adless youtube, but apparently root is not a prerequisite - there also installation using dev mode. Admitedly, haven’t tried it and it’s probably less convenient to get it set up, but then it should be a one time thing.

    • Zadhu@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ve got an LG C1 and have been using homebrew with Dev mode for a while now.

      Can confirm it is very easy to do if you have a basic tech knowledge base.

      The only inconvenience is sometimes after updates it will delete the homebrew apps but its a 5 minute job to get them back and ive only had it happen probably 3 times over a year.

      “Youtube no ads” - the homebrew app, works flawlessly as if it were the original app with all of your subs etc but every now and then a tiny banner comes up begging me to subscribe to premium which I actually love because I can keep telling them to fuck off. The frequency of the little banner is probably once every few times you open the app and its non-intrusive.

      Overall the LG dev mode trick with the Youtube No Ads app has been the cleanest and most enjoyable out of the box experience compared to alternative frontends etc.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I have an LG with WebOS and have youtube premium and haven’t seen any ads so far (though it may be regional). Cheers for the link, tough. I wonder if it works on Japanese versions

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I also noticed that they started showing ads upon opening YouTube on Android TV.

    Google sucks so bad.