• Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    From the article:

    However, there will be some who argue that these emulation handhelds – which often come pre-loaded with hundreds of games without paying the copyright holders a single penny – are legally dubious at the best of times, and Nintendo is well within its rights to try and shut down any outlet which promotes them.

    That is absurd. The copyright holders make nothing regardless, as the games are not for sale anymore.

    Switch emulation is definitely up for debate. But hardware and games that are no longer made? Come on now…

    • Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Regardless of the legality of the action or the product itself, a video reviewing, showing or reporting on it shouldn’t be passable of a copyright claim.

      Even if the video shows copyrighted material, it still shouldn’t be allowed for Nintendo to claim it, as that would fall under fair use. Just showing a few screenshots of a video game for the purposes of education in an otherwise unrelated video would never fall under copyright infringement.

      The piracy argument has nothing to do with Nintendo claiming a video as their own, despite them having no rights to do so.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      these emulation handhelds – which often come pre-loaded with hundreds of games

      I can only speak for the retroid pocket I have. It’s not far off from a stock android phone, sans camera and modem, plus d-pad and sticks.

      It only came preloaded with a few open source emulators available on play store for free in addition to GApps (with official play store support).