• Weslee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I always wondered why glados is fine, just saying because she’s a potatoe doesn’t sit with me because she recognised the paradox herself, so she must know what a paradox is and understand why it’s dangerous for ai, even in potatoe form

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think she was intelligent enough to temporarily shut down the portions of her brain that would be effected. At least that was my take.

        • JustARegularNerd@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I always saw it as her just saying in her mind, “This. Statement. Is. False.” thus just being some four individual one word sentences.

          • Weslee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That is plausible, but she saw the sign and read the paradoxes on the signboard - surely just seeing the paradoxes written on the sign would have caught her off guard. I guess it doesn’t matter, they just wanted to do a funny moment and it was still good

      • rmuk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, the implication being that in a typical Sledgehammers-To-Crack-Nuts solution to a nonexistent problem, Aperture put full-blown, totally sentient AIs in their cubes/turrets that were at least as intelligent as Wheatley.

        Also I only just noticed that Bagley from Watch Dogs is very, very similar to Wheatley.