35 crypto companies got together to make a change dot org petition called “Bitcoin Deserves an Emoji”.

F that

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Now, overlay that price chart with a transaction count chart averaged out over say 90 days and what you will notice is that big spike up to 400 and above was at basically no transaction volume which makes it seem more like that was hype. Looking at the price chart over shorter timeframes such as a year will show you that the transaction count is actually increasing now and the price is staying quite stable.

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Ignore the glaring flaws and look only at the parts I tell you to” is great fiscal policy and inspires a lot of trust. You nerds are basically sending PGP emails to each other and pretending it’s money. It isn’t — it’s literally nothing.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          No, because the rest of us have to deal with the environmental destruction wrought by your virtual paperclip maximizer. it affects everyone.

          • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Fine, go after the industries that are doing more, such as industrial processing for making glass and other things that require high temperatures, the global transportation industry, etc.

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why would I “go after” an industry producing something useful, rather than grifters powering GPUs to do absolutely nothing of value? We can get to the glass industry once we’ve culled the useless garbage first.

              • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Monero is CPU based. And actually we are providing something of value in that we are providing a private currency not controlled by any government where no government can tell you you can or cannot use it because they have no power to stop you from doing so. Now, whether you believe that is something we need in this world or not is a different value set.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why should we care what they go after? If they regulate or tax mining, that’s just a difficulty adjustment that won’t impact our security budget.

              There’s a Pareto improvement to be had here.

          • 0x0@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            Your comment costs data-center energy, please help save the environment by not commenting.

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 months ago

            Monero is mining-resistant, which means mining farms are going to be unprofitable. The people mining Monero are regular enthusiasts, so that should mean there’s less wasted energy from a ton of people competing over the same number of coins. Oh, and Monero has no maximum block-size, which keeps transaction costs low (which means even less competition over mining).

            I don’t know of a good way to estimate Monero electricity usage, but I’m guessing it’s way less than Bitcoin has per transaction, or at least it would be if they had a similar number of transactions. Monero is a lot more complex currency (so one transaction will actually spawn a bunch of “fake” transactions), but that mining-resistance is doing some work.

            Here’s Monero’s webpage, which has some discussion on energy usage, which I think I’ve summarized well above.

    • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I don’t know if this argument is the winner you thought it was. A currency where people aren’t using it as a means of exchange because of price fluctuations is a failure.

      • cygnus@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        No, no, hear them out. It’s actually super great that when you walk into the grocery store the loaf of bread is $1.50, and by the time you walk to the bread aisle it’s $0.72, and by the time you walk to the cashier it’s $2.10. This is actually super great, because there’s also a medium country’s worth of electricity being consumed to enable that.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          When i pick up a loaf of bread its 0.012, and when i check out its 0.012. Currentsies are going to shift against each other. The exact same thing would occur if you walked into a store in, say, Germany and handed them dollars. Also, do you mind telling me how much energy the banking system uses to run their equipment, build their buildings, have their employees come to their branches, move armored trucks full of cash, etc. Like, I can understand the power use thing being an issue. But if you want to go after something that would make more of a difference, how about figuring out thermal bricks or something for industries making glass? Which produces a hell of a lot more greenhouse gases than crypto mining does. Industrial processes are a huge polluter. Or how about the global transportation system?

          • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is the poster child for whataboutisn. You literally just argued that it’s okay for cryptocurrencies to pollute and waste energy because it takes energy to make glass too.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        It fluctuates with an I narrow range, and as it gets more adoption, that range is continuing to narrow. As a matter of fact, I sell items for Monero and I keep my prices completely stable and people do come to buy things. https://xmrbazaar.com/user/shortwavesurfer2009/. I have my prices set in such a way that they will stay stable until at least December 1st of 2024 at which time I will update them if need be.