Agreed.
Also active/passive gets confusing crossing over into electronics where they already mean something.
Agreed.
Also active/passive gets confusing crossing over into electronics where they already mean something.
You’re tearing me apart lisa!
Thanks, ill check it out
Autodesk for myself, apparently its super dependant on .net and other windows framework so its not like they are going to make it linux compatible any time soon.
Using GIMP, getting sucked off while wearing a GIMP suit.
Finger sweatbands for epic googling activities
Imagine if all it took was someone with a disease to stroll through congress one day and wipe out those past the best before date
Because then if your twin children got into a fight whilst cutting out paper star decorations you would get to say its star craft brood war.
Wouldnt his mum do the clapping for him?
Fucked On Race Day
Looking at the horizon line is effective, its about your eyes and ears agreeing on the information they are receiving. If your ears are telling you that your moving but your eyes only see the static area around you (inside the boat, close water, etc) then your eyes are saying ‘no movement here buddy’ and then your brain gets confused and you feel sick as a result. Looking at the horizon (or land if your are within eyesight) gives your brain a visual reference that ties into the inner ear sensor input
Well by definition right?
Progressive outlook means your open to new ideas, exploring new territory, open to concept that challenge what you think and know, and gives you the ability to push boundaries, make new discoveries and try new things.
Conservative outlook on the other hand means you are content and safe with the familiar, doing things the way they have always been done because its tried and true, however this means if they feel unconfortable or threatened by ideas which are going to change the way the live and how things work which makes them dig their heels in and get defensive.
Preface: I am no expert, this is just my understanding.
Weapons that are illegal/considered war crimes fall roughly into categories of:
A. Indiscriminate - kill soldiers and non-combatants/civilians alike (eg. Land mines, incendiary, cluster bombs, etc)
B. Cruel - especially painful ways to die or designed to cause ongoing suffering and maiming. (Eg: gas/chemical warfare, dirty bombs, etc)
A lot of weapons tick both of those boxes, and there are possibly more i am unaware of.