5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.
5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.
You assume MS is competent?
I mean, I’d definitely do it to SBF if his crap wasn’t cleaned out already. Though admittedly I’d largely keep going just because this world DESPERATELY needs fewer SBF types in it…
I’ve had both happen a lot. Only the basic stuff gets a correct answer, because nuance is difficult even for the tech savvy.
No, it is always the same question.
… from a person sitting in a very different situation with a slightly different problem.
I only show respect to respectable beliefs. If someone thinks someone else deserves to die because Sky Daddy says they did a bad thing, I’m making fun of them because they’re a contemptable moron, not a paragon of wisdom.
I think that’s more about they disn’t come out to greet him. Like if you got home from work and your dog doesn’t come out wagging, you immediately know something is up.
Of course, it still ignores precognition, but then God as described in the bible is literally impossible in so many ways, so…
All parsers ignore a shitload of whitespace already. Just compare unformatted code, COMPLETELY unformatted code, code without character returns, and it’ll become obvious how any given language is interpreted around whitespace.
Also fun to see just how infrequent a semicolon is ‘actually’ needed to tell when the end of a statement is here.
Here’s a hint: “packaging it up and selling it” is not the solution to anything work related.
We NEED a rated R season 3 and that bitch will give me the script! …
… /s
I mean, if you don’t even know what OS you’re on…
Next you’re going to tell me cars need boosters so babies can reach the pedals… At a certain point, it becomes irresponsible to enable ignorance.
Yea… pipeline and dependency auditing isn’t trivial if you want to catch the subtle stuff. Even most of the devs that know how to do it are going to respond with, “above my pay grade…” unless they’re somehow actually getting paid enough to be arsed to do it correctly…
Logical errors are an entire domain of programmer troubleshooting. All you’ll have to do is attempt to learn programming, and you WILL write something that throws no errors, performs terribly, and confuses you for hours.
We all do. It’s almost a badge of honor to push past a few of them.
Hell, sometimes it happens when no one has made an error but a particular mix of data or odd arrangement of hardware it ends up running on hits an undiscovered edge case that buggers things up.
Yea, useful ones like medicare and social services, right?! … right…?
Yea, they’re just spitting facts. Elon would have to be an actual man to ever.
He would have to know what he’s talking about to be specific.
I’m not saying don’t criticize it. I’m saying even understand what it’s trying to do before you start whining about how it doesn’t work.
This was always, ALWAYS going to happen. That was the plan. The idea isn’t to magically solve all of Reddit’s problems, but to decentralize the product. It’s the same product, OF COURSE it has nearly the same identical flaws on a per-instance basis.
The entire point is the federation and choice, NOT some mystical idea of a Reddit without Reddit problems. That’s just stupid expectations.
That’s … still the case in the monolith places??
Your negativity is seriously stupid… On the level of, “Well if we cannot stop people from doing something, why even make it illegal!?”
Yes, ANYTHING can be abused. You are soooo wise for pointing that out…
Ahh yes, the ability to have different communities with different rules is WORSE than a monolith that bans anyone who disagrees with Dear Leader…
Your views are completely ignorant to what the entire point of the fediverse even is. If you want to go live under a king that can have you killed for frowning at him … leave. No one is keeping you here against your will.
Well if they didn’t even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph…
My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.