As long as they don’t fuck it up in a similar fashion to seemingly every other thing they have tried for a couple decades.
As long as they don’t fuck it up in a similar fashion to seemingly every other thing they have tried for a couple decades.
Assuming it takes its answer from search results, and the search results are all affiliate marketing sites that just want you to click on a link and buy something, this makes perfect sense.
I’m not saying it’s good (because it’s not) but I’m unfortunately pretty certain they’re correct.
Is language conscious?
Are atoms?
I don’t know if LLMs of a large enough size can achieve (or sufficiently emulate) consciousness, but I do know that we barely know anything about consciousness, let alone it’s limits.
The thing is, LLMs can be used for something like this, but just like if you asked a stranger to write a letter for your loved one and only gave them the vaguest amount of information about them or yourself you’re going to end up with a really generic letter.
…but to give me amount of info and detail you would need to provide it with, you would probably end up already writing 3/4 of the letter yourself which defeats the purpose of being able to completely ignore and write off those you care about!
I keep forgetting that that’s an option
Perhaps there is some line between assuming infinite growth and declaring that this technology that is not quite good enough right now will therefore never be good enough?
Blindly assuming no further technological advancements seems equally as foolish to me as assuming perpetual exponential growth. Ironically, our ability to extrapolate from limited information is a huge part of human intelligence that AI hasn’t solved yet.
GPT-2 came out a little more than 5 years ago, it answered 0% of questions accurately and couldn’t string a sentence together.
GPT-3 came out a little less than 4 years ago and was kind of a neat party trick, but I’m pretty sure answered ~0% of programming questions correctly.
GPT-4 came out a little less than 2 years ago and can answer 48% of programming questions accurately.
I’m not talking about mortality, or creativity, or good/bad for humanity, but if you don’t see a trajectory here, I don’t know what to tell you.
They’re only people when it’s convenient for the voting/election rights of the rich people who own them…so actually a lot like slaves.
I first heard this joke on a very butch lesbian’s stand up special in comedy central like 15 years ago. I think about it every time I hear the song.
The most important line on that page:
“FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.”
Considering last year was six days ago…I agree.
I would say the same for both.
He did, and his poll numbers didn’t drop.
It just occurred to me that AI in the nearish future will probably/almost certainly be able to do this.
Sometimes I honk, but I press the horn too hard so it does the BIG honk, instead of the little polite honk I wanted and then I feel like a jerk.
I’m not sure if it’s still the case, but asking it to review what it just wrote for errors has led to significant quality improvements previously.
This is what Ilya saw…