Sure, except the randos will be narrowed to an extremely small subset of the population.
Like, one-in-a-hundred-million small.
Sure, except the randos will be narrowed to an extremely small subset of the population.
Like, one-in-a-hundred-million small.
Indeed. And how is this a “…miniature epiphany that highlights the oddities of the familiar”?
It follows neither the letter nor the spirit of the community, and moreover creates disagreement in a community meant to be lighthearted and at worst, darkly amusing.
Firstly, you’re forgetting we live in a democracy. Voting is the source of that governments power - a mandate provided by the people.
Secondly, how the hell is this a shower thought? Shower thoughts are meant to be short, concise and interesting. This screed does not fit the bill.
Does adding rocks to a rock make it rockier, or harder? Does it become a rocky rock?
You’re measuring a quality of the two objects, not the quantity, which might make a difference. I’m just sharing something I learned that I think is cool:)
I mean, Cantor said so, not I. But an easy example
Imagine a list of all whole numbers. 1, 2, 3 on up and up. Obviously this list is infinite - numbers do not end.
Now imagine a list of all real numbers - that is, all numbers plus their decimal amounts between each while number. 1, 1.1, 1.11, 1.12, 2, 2.1, and so on. This list is also infinite - but it is also inherently larger than the infinite list of only whole numbers. It has more numbers.
Fun fact: you can have multiple sets of infinities and even though all are infinite, that does not mean they are all equal. See Georg Cantor.
You can bend or break rules, laws, and your waifu as well. Are they objects or concepts?