Honestly this looks like a perfect way to make both python and bash more complex in a single move

I create proper libraries. I don’t do snippets because they make code dirty, redundant and difficult to read on the long run.

I actively discourage people in my team to use snippets copy and pasted everywhere themselves. If it’s reusable code, it should be usable by everyone and well tested

This was my immediate reaction as well.

For those who like living a messy life, there’s always Visual Studio (the original beast, not VSCode)

VSCode supports it also for other shells. This repo is not about vscode, it’s about actual shells. You are the one incorrect in this case

When someone brings points in the discussion, you react like a fan boy student that just bought the new gaming laptop.

Could you please reply about the discussion or go back to school? I am too old for your “no, you shit, you stoopid”

I wonder myself why I keep answering to your comments and that’s why this is my last comment

Unfortunately… That is why I commented above…

Powershell is a shell that pretends to be an OO language and that fails dramatically at both.

It was a design mistake. Much better having a real separation, a real shell and a real OO language. As even Microsoft has recently understood. As you can see also in this case, where Powershell is the last entry

What is a real advantage compared to plain autocomplete? Was it trained to know command flags?

It is anyway nice to see that even in Microsoft the abomination of Powershell is the lowest in the list of shells. It is probably time for them to drop it completely

ML/AI is a huge field. If you don’t like 1 side of it, there are millions others.

ML/AI. Everything else has been eaten by agile/product owners/MBAs/micromanagement. Luckily those people still don’t understand AI… And AI is still stochastic, pi planning and burnout charts don’t work.

If agile bites your ass… Run away, you are too young for wasting your life

All scientific computing is built on top of fortran. Even cutting edge AI runs on top of high performance libraries written in fortran and c. Simply there is less need for fortran developers because high performance subroutines are wrapped to be called by higher level languages, such as python

First time I see “cool” and “c#” on the same sentence. I’ve always thought stereotype of c# is that it is the language for corporate, extremely uncool projects.

Just a comment. Cobol nowadays is heavily outsourced. There are jobs but not so lucrative as in the past. Fortran is still strong in scientific computing, but nowadays it is wrapped in python. All people I know who were strong in fortran (me included) are nowadays mostly working with python or scala, most of us on ML/AI related stuff.

It refers to the fact that feelings are not a reflection of the outside reality, but a reflection of one’s perception of it. According to OP, this is proven by how feelings completely change by simply changing the way the brain perceives reality, via a psycotropic compound, while actual reality remains unchanged.

This is a well known scientific and philosophical fact, that OP has only come to know recently thanks to personal experience with psycotropic drugs

Such epiphany resulted in the shower thought we are commenting.

beep beep, I am not a bot, this action wasn’t performed automatically

That requires user profiling, something most lemmy users are vocally against.

It also requires a data science team and a bunch of additional legal stuff.

Not even a pure mckinsey type of company value kpis over stakeholders’ feedbacks. If a company is purely kpi driven, it is a bad company, as kpi cannot catch everything, but have limited and specific scope. Your managers should go back to their MBAs, and revise their stakeholder management skills. If a manager get a feedback that one of their team members is jeopardizing a project and the relationship with clients due to taking responsibilities and tasks for which they have no competency, it is extremely bad. In this case is even proved by the fact that the company must spend resources lowering the clients expectations. Managers should absolutely act. If this doesn’t happen, the managerial side of your company is pretty broken

Lemmy user here, I don’t see it either… The guy has bad settings

Best practice is to clearly state that PM here is not competent for its job, either he finds a solution himself (e.g. he manages expectations of clients without admitting he fucked up) or he has to be replaced.

This kind of situation is very dangerous. PM shouldn’t take similar decisions, nor promising anything

Why do you have a project manager discussing technical solutions? That’s kind of… very wrong. Most PMs nowadays have a just a slightly better technical background than a secretary…

You can easily build one yourself. Check llamaindex and langchain for prebacked solutions. Otherwise the math is pretty trivial if you are using normalized embeddings. You can quickly do one with numpy.

My suggestion anyway is to start with langchain, full of tutorials executable as jupyter notebook

Source? I’d like to read the story

Edit. https://www.edn.com/1st-fortran-program-runs-september-20-1954/

Magit is super cool but not exactly easy to use :D

For these reasons, I always push for simple and straightforward workflows and many commits and merges. For many people git remains a mistery also after years working on it. I blame the easy-to-use guis, many people learn 2 buttons to press for a workflow, and they never care learning more