be_excellent_to_each_other

  • 0 Posts
  • 14 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 21st, 2023

help-circle

  • From a capitalist perspective it’s ideal if your workers are on the verge of poverty, living paycheck to paycheck. That’s exactly where you want them.

    People in that situation won’t complain. Won’t stand up for themselves or their rights. Will take poor treatment and deal with it. Will work in unethical or even illegal ways and keep quiet because they have no choice.

    Even better if you can tie people’s health insurance to their job, then you’ve really got them by the balls.

    I’ve got a pretty decent job, and earn pretty good money. But I’m the only earner in a family of four and no, we haven’t made all the best financial decisions at times.

    What you have described is exactly where we live, and while there isn’t that much I want to stand up to at work in the first place, 100% I don’t make any waves that don’t have a basis in the hard facts of my job, and for this very reason. I’d like to go in an ask for a merit based raise, I’d like to fight harder for more people to be hired in our (spread very thin) department, and there are a few other things I’d like to at least ask for and feel OK about standing firm on.

    But I don’t, because I don’t want to jeopardize what I’ve got.








  • I think the issue is that there’s a slow trickle of people who have just gotten in and go “Wow I just got in, has anyone got any tips?”

    Find one or more feeds you like and pin them. I use the newly created For You feed (which algorithmically puts stuff there it thinks you will like) and a couple of topical feeds that are specific to my interests. I think it’s great. Way more content that I care about than there ever was on twitter, and way way more engagement between folks.

    I’m a big proponent of Mastodon/Firefish in general, but while they win in volume, Bluesky is already pulling ahead for me in signal to noise ratio. (I think that’s very subjective to what things interest you, so YMMV.)






  • So what’s the magical percentage of market share that gets Adobe to port their proprietary software over to Linux?

    Something more than what it currently is.

    But as a linux-only user since 2007, it’s my opinion that this sort of thing is less and less of a problem for most (note I did not say all) use cases.

    There’s very few things I have wanted to do with a computer (as a tech enthusiast since the 80s) that isn’t doable on Linux. At this point I find most things I personally want to do are easier on Linux.

    Gaming is coming along nicely thanks to Proton, which is not as good as native support, but which is still such a turnaround from even 10 years ago that it’s pretty amazing.

    Non-gaming applications usually (not always) have a Linux equivalent that requires nothing more than decoupling what you need to do from the software you think you need to do it. That’s a hard sell if your boss or your teacher tells you all your tasks MUST be done in tool XYZ, but for other things it’s not so bad.

    99% of what a non-professional thinks they need photoshop for is going to be doable in Krita or Gimp for example. Inkscape and Blender are well regarded for their purposes even outside the Linux community, very few people are really doing something in Word that can’t be done in Libre Office Writer, etc…

    This isn’t intended as a campaign speech for Linux - I’ve long ago realized that for various reasons it’s not a good fit for some folks, or it could be but they aren’t interested. That’s fine, IMO. However, for the vast majority of what people use a PC for these days, I personally am doubtful that Linux is an obstruction to completing those tasks so much as it might be a paradigm shift for folks to rethink how they intend to complete those tasks.

    It’s been many years since I’ve even wanted to run anything from Adobe on Linux. YMMV.