You can always dig a canal to bring flooding into the business district, think outside the box!
This is obviously a crude attempt at a joke and not real advice.
You can always dig a canal to bring flooding into the business district, think outside the box!
This is obviously a crude attempt at a joke and not real advice.
Nice post, thanks for sharing!
I think its pretty healthy to always check your assumptions. Some things that are mainstream are actually pretty crazy, but taken as normal because we’re used to them. For instance, GDP is a pretty crazy way to measure economic health.
I used to use ansible and helm, but it is overkill for my case. Today I basically use a combo of markdown and bash scripts, the combination of them allows me to run the scripts straight from my IDE.
I have a slightly different theory. Basically they haven’t arrived because they look at their navigator, sees that our planet is named dirt and just assume the developers forgot to delete a test value.
I had the same idea a couple years back and even though I would love something that you download and just run and it would work, I realized that in order to get a decent adoption rate, you would need a whole ecosystem, similar to apple in order for it to work.
I still think you can develop something like a hub where you install services like apps, but I doubt it would attract anyone outside selfhosting circles.
Personally I think the feeling of wet socks trumps both of these, but we’re all different.
I pre-heat and I read tos;dr for laughs and giggles of what they’re trying to force me to agree to.
I think I see what you mean now. We both agree that wealth hoarding need to go, but I think I focus more on the problems it would cause and you just wanting to set a limit and deal with any issues as they arise. Is that a correct assumption?
I am not saying it is dangerous. My point is that taking a decision that is polar opposite of our financial system will come with consequences, many of them will not be simple to predict.
What happens after you accumulate 100 million? Are you allowed to work? Will you have to give up the interest your existing assets earn you? Do we tax everything the limit at 100%? How will we deal with the fact the some countries will attract people with lots to lose by not following the system?
These are of course just random thoughts, but I think most of us can come up with plenty of things that can jeopardize such a plan.
I don’t dismiss the idea, but I think a lot of safeguards need to be in place before such a plan could work.
While I don’t disagree with the sentiment, I do think a ban on resource hoarding would also require an overhaul of the capitalist system. Hoarding resources is exactly the point of our current system and banning it would most likely have hard to predict consequences.
There are several things you can and should do to harden your server, many of them can be found here.
My os is running with a slightly modified us qwerty, which then is mapped through keyboard firmware to a modified us dvorak.
Ah just read the post title. Thanks for the correction!
l wouldn’t call half of these java frameworks
Not to piss on anyones parade here, but grepping something out of a json structure is one of the most asked questions for jq as well. Of course json is nice, but if the goal is to simplify data extraction, I’m not sure much will be gained by this.
As far as reducing the toolchain necessary to extract the same data, this is a welcome addition.
Just wait until you learn that you can debug sql queries the same way in most rdbms admin tools.
You could look into apps like authelia, keycloak, authentic, etc.
I’m thinking Anoia from the mind of Terry Pratchett.
It broke too many thumbs.