While right now that may not be the case, but as someone who looked into the topic I can definitely say that it has similar potential. It’s just that a lot of companies just duct-tape AI onto their product and the result they get is usually shitty. But if you ignore all those “projects” that are obviously meant to fail, there are some promising projects and applications for AI that are actually made by people who understand what they are doing, the limitations and the upsides of the technology and they may just make products that are indeed useful.

Sorry for the undecipherable wall of text, it’s early in the morning for me.

For me it’s categorizing radical ideologies correctly. I just hate people throwing around buzzwords, calling anyone a communist/fascist they disagree with. Those words have meanings. You can actually be worse then the fascists and still not be one, it’s not impossible. You can still be hated for that, but you didn’t automatically become one, because you are right-wing and coincidentally an asshole. But the moment someome calls you a fascist, while you’re just an asshole, their opinon automatically becomes invalid and wrong.

This is actually a great shower thought. Not something I’d normally think about, but playing with the thought trolls do seem likely to try and annoy people this way.

I’d argue that’s not a unique person, but a unique skill of an ordinary person. Interacting with Socrates as a person probably wouldn’t have been extraordinary but experiencing his unique ideas for the time would have.

I mean in the grand scheme of things there are only a handful of types of people, maybe a few hundred and those types repeat over and over. Everyone has their own unique experiences, personal drama and relationships, but their behavior and core traits are shared with probably millions of people throughout history. Thinking you are unique is not a rational belief and if it becomes integral to one’s personality (like it has to millions of people before them) I think they should be mocked, just for the sake of getting their heads straight.

It’s not that you aren’t allowed to be the most important character of your story, it’s just that you shouldn’t think that’s because you are something that never was before and never will be after.

From what I see most elections always are.

But lukewarm and mid isn’t.

Shouldn’t a woman and a man with the same height, weight, and body-muscle percentage be basically identical in terms of athleticism or am I wrong?

I like this. It’s not really helpful in the sense that it seems almost as hard as being perfect yourself, but nonetheless it’s possible, contrary to the alternative.

Don’t get fooled, that’s called stockholm syndrome.

“I thought of that, but not enough to act on it!”

Faults may be found in the reasoning, but even with that, this may just be the truth.

“Couldn’t count all the stuff”

You know what, since I get what you’re trying to say (even though you’re technically wrong) you can have my upvote.

Don’t get me wrong, I know exactly what you mean, I just have a suspicion that you might not.

This is the beuty of FOSS. I can add them myself, whenever I want to.

I would pronounce it with a Ezh (Ʒ) (the sound in pleasure), as that’s the sound we use to pronounce it in my language.

Shit, if ungendered pronouns make it woke, then I should ditch my native language.

Well not completly, but yes most of the servers run linux

Until the moment someone finds a privilage escalation bug.