The point being, an excellent personal choice at the expense of the greater whole?
The point being, an excellent personal choice at the expense of the greater whole?
I’ve been wondering something, specifically related to something I heard mentioned last night on a stream: their hypothesis was that real life ground game, door knocking or whatever, doesn’t matter any more, and the modern ‘ground game’ is social media and 1:1 conversations.
When ‘reasonable’ people delete/deleted twitter/facebook in droves, are we just ceding the ground game to the racists and the ones who can shout the most hate?
I expect something like this to end up being the solution, but I think we’re far from a consensus in that regard.
Is internet archive that big? i would imagine you could run it successfully with a dozen or so people tbh
This is fake news, he stole the research from Jane Menopause who goes uncredited to this day
So the litmus test for a bot is to ask if it’s skibidy?
if Google wants paid, they can make a compelling and competitive product
Generally isn’t even a factor. Hexbears have some nuclear takes, but they are death on transphobia
Storage more likely. Google owns fiber backbones and peers against the tier 1 providers directly. The over all point of ‘no, it’s still prohibitively expensive’ stands unless you’ve got 20B of dark fiber in your pocket.
I cannot imagine how those two things could possibly be true unless you did actually hear of him and either got the name wrong or just forgot
Meaning it legally must be a sealed unit with only 2 states, high and low. In Europe and/or other places there may be multiple angle states and/or strip headlights or other stuff based on their specific regulations. The result is that the efficacy of US headlight systems have a hard upper bound for how effective they can be, based on what was practical to do in the 60s.
It’s not useless, it’s saying you can’t afford the better quality product you dirty, dirty poor.
I unironically think it would be easier to train users that the report button works now than it would to get automated reporting that was worth a damn implemented.
Agreed, but I don’t think anyone here is arguing against split bill for generation vs grid maintenance and improvement, just that they want return on the power they put back into the grid, if for no other reason than to offset their own investment
Sure, but it’s ‘free’ generation capacity, and storage works far better at grid scale
My solution to this was to put the default download folder on an nvme and then move the torrent to a storage hdd after completion
Still easier than getting multicast working
Leaving aside the problematic nature of the existing terms, the result was that people actually thought a little more about the relationships the things had and started using better/more precise terminology for the relationships: primary/secondary, active/hot/cold, parent/child, etc.
Net positive all round.
You know, after last week? Maybe they’re on to something here