Too bad they own everything that could stop this

Also, how can they sue a company based in another country.

The AI encouraged him to do it

I mean, I think people like Euler are geniuses. Dude created so many theorems that they had to start naming them after the second person to discover them.

They were saying they want the AI to tell them about relevant news in-between blocks of music, not that they want AI to pick the music for them.

That’s not at all what they were talking about

With all the ugly angles that sounds dangerous

They can’t if it’s never connected to the internet.

Brother is the way to go

The Steam Deck is a similar concept

But, my prediction for the majority of users is that the device will just connect to a vdi infrastructure that you pay monthly for.

It always drives me insane when I have to spec out a $4k system for execs that use it mostly to browse Facebook and LinkedIn. At least the devs get the same systems.

That’s just because you don’t have an argument to refute what I said.

The reason regulations exist is because of how horrible things were when they didn’t exist.

Edit: See. When pressed for an actual response they dipped out. All you have to do is look at the history of the US post industrial revolution to know that libertarianism is by far worse than our current system, and that’s saying a lot.

Corporations only exist to limit personal liability. If you remove the regulations that hold people liable, corporations won’t need to exist because the days of the barons and tycoons will return.

No, it’s a hated ideology because it doesn’t work, and all it does is show your lack of understanding of how the world and human behavior work

Letting private businesses run unchecked is always going to be a bad idea. Full stop.

Using homeassistant and esphome is a good starting place unless you want to learn python or C

Not mine! But my hobby is making my own smart devices.

I wouldn’t bet on one of the biggest data harvesters not using a smart device to harvest data.

That was for a different reason, though. That was Microsoft forcing you to use their software on something you owned. A website can say, “you have to use chrome to access our site,” and that’s not antitrust behavior on the part of Google.

That’s the problem. Google is working so that there’s not going to be a next thing.

Your past experiences with Firefox are irrelevant because we’re talking about the future.