Put the rose tinted glasses to one side. We still had harmful viruses back in the day, difference is these days you are storing more private information “online” so the effect of compromise is larger.
Put the rose tinted glasses to one side. We still had harmful viruses back in the day, difference is these days you are storing more private information “online” so the effect of compromise is larger.
It’s mostly extremist left, I just threw in the right so I didn’t get downvoted lol
The downvotes are from Americans. Remember that downvotes are not a measurement of correctness, it’s just popularity and there are more Americans here than any other country
For me it’s the extremist left and right it’s had to block. It really is better without them
Logically this “value” of a road is your predicted speed taking into account speed=distance/time. Modern navigation systems work the exact same way.
You know damn right people drive highway speeds on side roads in GTA
Call yourself whatever you want, I’m an astronaut on tuesdays
A programmer can call themselves an engineer if they want. In my country there are no laws against it.
Therefore it doesn’t matter what you call yourself.
You do know kids can find out grandma is on tiktok other ways than just the site itself? Touch grass, remember there’s a world outside
Clearly fake. No task ever includes anything but the happy path. Loading or failure states are a myth
Yeah it’s definitely up to interpretation, it doesnt read as the middle slide being bad/villainous.
Bad meme format I guess
To be fair thor is undoubtedly firmly in the hero category, and they are depicted as him in this meme Thor Ragnarok.
top slider is hella (villain) middle is Thor (hero), bottom is Surtur (villain)
Cries in britland
Good point but there has to be a balance somewhere.
If you have extremest moderators in charge of a community which is seemingly unbiased by its name can be misleading. Others will not create duplicate communities because one already exists with that name. And then those mods ban anyone who opposes their view creates a strong echo chamber and a unrealistic and unrepresentative community.
I’m mostly saying this because of moderators of noncredibledefense for example. They will ban people who state they oppose an all out war with Russia, which is madness. Yes it’s a shitpost community but there’s a line.
I don’t take any article post or comment seriously anymore. Between the era of misinformation and advancements in AI, my trust in the internet is at an all time low.
Make your own decisions, second guess everything
That’s basically the upvote/downvote button.
This should be an overhaul of the moderation system in general. I find some communities have mods which ban based on disagreement alone regardless of any imposed rules.
I would like to see some kind of community review system on bans and their reasonings where the outcome can result in a punishment/demotion of the moderator who abused their power.
Nah you need two good grades to get a degree
I know that one! That’ a name of a 2D shape
“Untrusted source” is ambiguous fyi