“Enrolled PCs will continue to receive Critical and Important security updates for Windows 10; however, new features, bug fixes, and technical support will no longer be available from Microsoft,” explains Yusuf Mehdi, executive vice president and consumer chief marketing officer at Microsoft.
Don’t threaten me with a good time.
No, redundancy is fine. It’s the proprietary backend and Ubuntu forcing it on users that people don’t like.
Yes, and they’re encouraging people to throw it out. At least some users think to sell on the secondary market, but third party buyers can only get so much out of EOL Windows machines and there are only so many linux users with an interest in buying up old hardware.
I myself have a couple of used laptops, but don’t need any more hardware for a while, so it’s not like I’m able to buy up any. I fear much of it will rot in a landfill.
Big company recommends users turn functional hardware into e-waste so they can boost quarterly profits.
Luckily between Amazon and ESPN+ I can meet most of my sportsball needs. For those not on the apps, there are websites that can assist.
I used to be into that, but Kodi started to become a pain after all the streamer quality got low, I had to pay for RealDebrid just to get a decent stream, I never quite got sports streaming to work with any of the apps, and the Firestick itself got ungodly slow over time.
I have PCs hooked up to all my TVs, so if I can’t find something on my streamers I can just open up my browser and google a solution.
Dude I use Lemmy to not see ads, why are you posting this?
Vanilla Ubuntu vs. Windows 10? I’ll take Windows.
If it’s like Kubuntu or Xubuntu vs. Windows 11, then I’ll take Ubuntu, but currently my jam is Debian with XFCE.
Apple announced that beginning with iOS 18.1, third-party developers will be able to enable tap-to-pay transactions in their own apps. Users will also be able to set a default app for contactless payments and change what happens when they double-click the power button.
2 years from now: “Why are Logitech sales down?”
Not a surprise: you took a pot shot at Winnie the Pooh, who’s owned by Disney. You should know better than to mess with the Mouse, especially when you’re comparing one of their beloved mascots to a dictator wannabe.
I’ve never been banned from a single reddit sub or lemmy community. Maybe it’s just you?
Not really, Raspberry Pi had that same issue with its 32 bit distros.
I’m personally a fan of his new site for twitter media: xvideos.
If you’re over 12 years old you probably won’t last more than a minute.
You’d need a central list, which would defeat the purpose of a decentralized system.
Or set it up so that when you share add community of an instance to your instance, it adds every community that community’s instance had indexed, which will very quickly populate all the major instances.
This is addressed in the first chapter of the book. His formal name is Edward Bear, but Christopher Robin calls him Winnie-the-Pooh without explanation, and the narrator improvises a backstory that justifies the nickname “Pooh.”
OP actually has the burden to prove their own claim, but here you go:
Suppose we create an algorithm to generate a random number, such that:
And so on. For example, if we generated the sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 it would represent the number 531.246.
For a number to be non-infinite, there must be at some point be a digit where all digits after it generate a 0.
For all numbers in our sequence, the probability of generating a 0 is 1/10: there is no point at which we cannot generate a 0. Furthermore, after the first 0 is generated at a, the odds of a+1 being 0 are also 1/10, as are the odds of a+2, a+3, and a+n. So we cannot identify a b, such that entry a+b must be >0, since the odds of any given a+b generating 0 are also 1/10.
Based on this, we can use induction to show that it is possible to generate a truly random number that is a terminating rational number, and indeed it is possible to show this for any specific number as well. For example, the number 2 can be generated by simply rolling “2, 0, 0, 0, 0, …” and there is no nth digit in the sequence that cannot be generated at 0, since the odds of any given n being 0 are still 1/10.
The probability of getting any number with a given set of characteristics is pretty much 0, but that doesn’t mean the number doesn’t exist once generated.
I’ve always taken it as they’re tabulating the gifts:
“Wow, today he gave me three french hens! Plus I have the two turtle doves from yesterday and the partridge in a pear tree from Christmas day!”