• TK420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    As all the cool kids keep saying, now is a great time to try out Linux.

    No, I’m not recommending a distro for you, that is what DuckDuckGo is for.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ubuntu is actually falling down the ad hole lately. It’s not great, even if you leave out the technical issues that the distribution leans into these day (snaps, amongst other things)

            • confuser@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              idk if im crazy but i tried like, all, of the commonly reccomended linux distros a few years back when it was my first time and really did not like any of them, and then i tried an arch derivative with plasma kde and then fell in love with arch based distros to the point that i absolutely do not want to use anything else. i tried endeavor os recently and have been loving it!

          • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            In the system update dialog, you’ll see something like:

            You’re not getting 53 critical security updates! Join Ubuntu Pro to keep yourself safe!

            Ubuntu Pro is a subscription service.

            This is seriously at the level of Norton “AntiVirus”, and it’s truly absurd and nakedly predatory.

            • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s free for personal use though. Canonical have turned ubuntu rather corporate, but let’s stick to the facts.

              • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                ·
                1 month ago

                Fair point.

                Counterpoint: why should I be compelled to give Canonical literally anything besides using the package manager to say “I’m using your software and I want the update”? Why do we need this additional new corporate-authorized side channel? What benefit does this yield, outside the realm of profit?

                • ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I agree.

                  They’re a for-profit company, ubuntu pro is supposed to entice business customers. You and I get introduced, because canonical hope that we might use ubuntu profesionally and they gain a new customer. I don’t hate it personally, but I see why people don’t like it.

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Wait, they’re withholding security updates unless you pay? Hope they go bankrupt.

        • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          does kubuntu have the same issues? kinda want to go for a debian or ubuntu based kde distro and kubuntu is always highly recommended.

            • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              way too difficult to set up, i don’t have a lot of free time so i need an “out of the box” distro

              • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                LMDE? The comfort of Mint with the stability of Debian. I picked it for my wife, who doesn’t want to mess with configs and tinkering around. I play tech support for her system when something goes wrong though.

                • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  i currently use mint and only want to switch because cinnamon has this weird thing when you have a game running, window resizing is laggy. i often have btd6 running when I’m working so it bugs me. kde doesn’t suffer from that.

                • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Seconding LMDE, been on it for a year on my study laptop. Literally never ever had a problem so far, and being an “out of box” distro there’s minimal work needed to daily drive.

              • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                Debian is honestly pretty trivial to set up these days.

                If you’re open to trying Fedora, I’ve been running F40KDE and Kinoite on two of my main personal laptops and I love them

                • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  i have tried fedora and nobara a few times but they randomly make my hdd unmountable and it’s difficult to get it back. even after installing a different distro.

      • palordrolap@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not sure I’d want to see that, tbh. It would only introduce more avenues for DDG to make questionable choices when they’re already on thin ice.

    • kuneho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, I’m not recommending a distro for you

      Don’t worry, everyone else does

    • Astral08@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Can you run windows games on linux without it being resource intensive like using a vm or something?

      • Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 month ago

        Gaming in Linux on a windows VM isn’t viable for most systems. Most games run really well through proton with little to no effort. Some even run better on Linux than on windows. You just can’t play a lot of the most popular competitive online games because it flags their anti cheat.

        • doctortran@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          It definitely depends on the game and the particulars of your own system.

          The answer to the question is a resounding “you’ll have to try it for yourself”. It could be flawless, it could be a nightmare, there’s a lot of variables.

      • LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Running software designed and compiled only for XYZ system is always going to incur overhead when translating or emulating to ABC system.

        Game authors and publishers who only build for Windows are giving users a big middle finger and essentially saying “You must suffer through Windows in order to enjoy our product hassle-free lol”.

        What worked for me (which may or may not work for others) was to wean myself away, at first with only playing games that were built natively for linux.

        Then moving the line in the sand to only DRM-free native linux builds.

        Then advancing to only open source games.

        These days, I just don’t even play games and I find that it really frees up what kinds of things I want to do on my computers, such as daily driving exotic CPU architectures (and also I have so much more free time for actual meaningful pursuits like learning new skills).

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      53
      ·
      1 month ago

      Actually to find a good distro and instructions on how to install them i recommend using an ai chatbot.

      Majority of people have never created a bootable media but its easy enough ai can guide them step by step.

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I love how they make people choose their distro rather then “ubuntu or bust” they still used ubuntu for their guide but yk it doesn’t matter that much

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Eh, just look up a reputable YouTube channel and guide. Chatbots can randomly make dumb mistakes that a total newbie won’t recognize, potentially causing them a lot of headache.

        And no, I’m not one of those diehard anti-AI people. My work has its own custom GPT model and I utilize it almost daily for menial tasks. But even having it generate script boilerplate and whatnot, I sometimes notice it writing stuff that won’t work and/or does it in a really verbose/weird way.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          You cant ask a youtube channel what distro best suit your specific usecase.

          Also realistically no one wants to sit trough a video to check out a strangers recommendation for linux.

          I do get that people are worried about the incompetence of AI but this topic and procedure is so bog standard i have more faith in chatgpt doing it then a human.

          If you dont believe me, try it.

          Ask chatgpt/claude/gemini “How to make a bootable linux media from windows” you will have to spend a long time trying before you find it fails on something this boilerplate.

          • bassomitron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            You don’t need to ask, as there are tons of well made videos giving great breakdowns of the most popular distros and the pros/cons of each while also showing demonstrations of a user session within them. To me, that’s far more informative than a broad, generalized typed paragraph. However, I will concede that I’m more a visual, hands-on learner, so this is subjective.

            And I agree, creating a boot disk is very simple and straightforward. The likelihood of GPT/Gemini getting it wrong is low. Especially Gemini/Copilot, as they basically just regurgitate the top tech site articles in this context and will cite the links it used (e.g. stack exchange, Tom’s hardware, etc). But like I said above, it can still happen, so why not just look up the source material for something so simple? I doubt any time is really saved by using AI in this instance. Not to mention, if you’re more of a visual person, it’s nice to see someone else give a demonstration.

            To each their own, though. Neither method is necessarily the wrong/better one.

            • candybrie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              It’s crazy how different people are. The idea of sitting through a video to do something like this is so painful to me. Like I find it useful for physical things where seeing the motion can be helpful, but I still generally find doing things that way awful. Please, please, please just give me written instructions for things. Especially if I’m going to need to refer back to it a few times (e.g. there are multiple steps that take a bit of time).

              • bassomitron@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                It depends on the context for me. Repairing/replacing something on like my lawnmower or car? Video all the way. A simple CLI command/process? A quick write-up is often preferred for me.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do chatbots provide accurate and safe instructions for all steps? Or will it mix different instructions for different scenarios?

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        I dislike AI but I think you’re unfairly downvoted. I find it helpful for ensuring I’m taking care of necessary steps in a common, low-stakes procedure. It’s useful to generate sequences of terminal commands as well, though it’s important to check and understand what you’re doing.

        • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          People are right to be worried and skeptical about AI

          I honestly have gotten to hate how incompetent it often is because i do regularly try to squeeze something actual intelligent from it.

          But other then that its like you said. Its very good for Low stake, common, boilerplate procedures and providing clear personalized instructions for non-techies. (and forgetful nerds).

          Credit where credit is due & can’t argue with results.

      • Mwa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ai is not that good unless it’s like hugginchat where it scraps sites for info and stuff

  • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    141
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I once ran the windows Troubleshooter to get an old scanner working, and the final page told me to but a new scanner!

    I plugged it in to a mini PC I use as a backup server and the scanner worked fine with Linux.

    And another recommendation issue: I noticed that my Windows laptop has a “reduce your carbon footprint” settings section that tells me to reduce power settings, screen brightness etc. but it’s completely lacking a “stop giving me AI search results in Bing” section.

    • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Switching from Windows to Linux on my Framework laptop makes my battery last 2-3 times as long. They should just have a switch to Linux recommendation to reduce your carbon footprint.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Are you using a framework 13? While I find the battery life to be usable, if it’s that much worse on Windows I’m not sure I would have gotten a framework if I used windows lol.

        • rubikcuber@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah. 11th gen Framework 13, so one of the first ones. Since I got it I had to use Windows exclusively because of some client work, and battery life was pitiful. 2-3 hours perhaps? Once that project finished I swapped out the SSD and put on Ubuntu with KDE. I was expecting the batter life to be worse, but it is demonstrably better. I now get more like 6 hours, albeit with my power plan on efficiency.

          • yonder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have one of the newer AMD models and I find it has about 2-3 hours of batter life, though it spends most of it’s time suspended for my use case. I use Fedora and have the “balanced” profile selected. I don’t mind the poor battery life since the processor is leaps and bounds better than the 6th gen 2 core Intel I was using before.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Win11 also says that showing seconds in the taskbar “reduces battery life”/“increases power consumption”

      • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        While it sounds ridiculous, there is a reasoning for this even nowadays:

        Any periodic activity with a rate faster than one minute incurs the scrutiny of the Windows performance team, because periodic activity prevents the CPU from entering a low-power state. Updating the seconds in the taskbar clock is not essential to the user interface, unlike telling the user where their typing is going to go, or making sure a video plays smoothly. And the recommendation is that inessential periodic timers have a minimum period of one minute, and they should enable timer coalescing to minimize system wake-ups.

        Found 1 test that seems to confirm battery life is slightly worse (2%) with seconds enabled. But this is true only when nothing is going on on screen. If you would actually work on PC, I imagine difference would be practically nonexistent.

        All that said, I use seconds on my private and work PC. Was pissed when MS initially removed this as an option.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          The moment I heard about the option was the moment I literally searched on how to enable/install this single KB-Update just so I can use it :P

          Regarding the battery: That would be like leaving the desktop on at all times and just doing something else. This could be appropriate for an e-ink display. Maybe a PC should embed what form-factor it is in the bios like android phones do (e.g. phone, tablet, phablet) and the display report what type of panel it is (e.g. e-ink, TN, IPS, VA, QLED/OLED hybrid).
          You can actually see those specs with AIDA64 on a phone. Very neat

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only time that would make a difference is if you’re staring at a blank page and the only thing causing the screen to update is the clock. Theoretically the GPU could go completely to sleep, except for having to draw the updated clock every second.

        But there’s a reason battery life is commonly measured as “hours of video playback”. If the laptop’s not actually doing anything you may as well turn it off and get weeks of battery life.

      • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        My god. It really does!

        Oh no! I left notepad.exe open. That cursor was flashing on and off for hours! I’m sorry everyone!

    • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Are you saying you use Bing for searches? If you don’t want that then why not use a different search?

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Big company recommends users turn functional hardware into e-waste so they can boost quarterly profits.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      when microsoft feels threatened by the recycling community being noticed, they add more technical constraints. Chromebooks are the gold standard for an intentionally non recyclable machine, neck and neck with apple.

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        The bullshit of chromeOS to be capable of running on the shittiest hardware but having an artificial lifetime for devices is stupid. To google’s credit, they did increase that limit to 10 years, but that was only recently.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s still functional hardware though…

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yes, and they’re encouraging people to throw it out. At least some users think to sell on the secondary market, but third party buyers can only get so much out of EOL Windows machines and there are only so many linux users with an interest in buying up old hardware.

        I myself have a couple of used laptops, but don’t need any more hardware for a while, so it’s not like I’m able to buy up any. I fear much of it will rot in a landfill.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    Microsoft recommends you remain ignorant about how awesome Linux is.

    • CluckN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Linux sounds good but I never see it discussed on this website. How am I suppose to use Arch if nobody else does?

        • Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’re on the wrong part of the Internet for that. Try Facebook or Instagram to learn more about Arch Linux.

        • Gremour@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Rejoice. I’ve installed Arch on my home PC a few days ago. Haven’t booted Windows since.

      • superminerJG@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I use EndeavourOS. I know quite a bit about Arch, the only thing I don’t really know how to do is install it manually.

      • demizerone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Ppl that still use Windows even after all this shit has been rammed down their throats will not have a good time on Linux. You still need to be able to do basic trouble shooting. I installed win 11 a few months back and it took me three tries on installation to get all the garbage out of it.

        I think the best bet is an entirely new system from the ground up that has an open architecture that every company can equally implement that from the ground up and is as simple as possible. Like the computers we had in the 80s, but with better graphics. You want to play a game, you boot into it and it’s the only thing running. No anti cheat needed.

        • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the best bet is an entirely new system from the ground up that has an open architecture that every company can equally implement that from the ground up and is as simple as possible.

          This keeps getting said by people who don’t understand operating systems. Even if you build something from the ground up, you still end up with an operating system very much like Linux and Windows. The choices that were made for each OS were not random. The principles of I/O, user input, graphics display, filesystems, etc, are more or less universal concepts across all OSes.

          What you will accomplish is making an OS that no one will use. Linux, Windows, and macOS already fill every market that can be filled. Microsoft tried to become a third player in the mobile market and their product died pretty quickly.

          Google has been trying to build Fuschia into a new OS and they’ve asked back their ambitions (from what I recall reading).

        • BearGun@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah no thanks, a PC that can only run one program at a time? that’s just a console but worse lol. almost entirely useless as a computer.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      … And FreeBSD! Hardware support is rather fine except for wifi, and that can be set up using wifibox packages (technically it’s running a lean Linux VM with wi-fi passthrough, but by today’s measure the footprint is negligible).

      So clean, orderly and patient.

      I can’t use facts and logic on what is optimized for what, but it feels more responsive than Linux too, with the same desktop setup. I guess Linux with a different scheduler would solve that.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 month ago

    My PC is getting old and I might replace it in about a year whenever I can get an OK GPU for a reasonable amount of money again.

    I’ve built my own PCs since the late 90’s and this will be the first time I will not install Windows on a computer I built. Get fucked Microsoft.

    • Lippy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I already did this 2 years ago and I still don’t miss Windows. I want my OS to just work, and that means not having big companies intentionally blocking updates and bullying consumers just so they can profit from artificially induced OEM license sales. It’s pretty wild how quickly Linux has fit the bill in recent years, and how Windows no longer does.

      Only hurdle on Linux right now is the transition from X11 to Wayland. Proton doesn’t have good support for it yet so I occasionally have to load an X11 session for some games to run. I can imagine that getting worked out eventually.

      Microsoft could have simply dropped official support for older machines and then literally done nothing and that would have still been better than what they did. At least then those machines would still receive security updates beyond next year, provided they could still run the latest version of Windows.

      For the record, if the arbitrary CPU block is bypassed, then it’s possible to install Windows 11 23H2 on a Prescott era Pentium 4 or Athlon 64. The true requirements did change for 24H2, but even then you can install that on a 1st gen Intel or a Bulldozer era AMD system. Microsoft can go suck a dick.

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ll also add the audio stack in Linux at the moment is a hot mess. I’m currently trying to resolve a problem that seems to exclusively plague the rear mic input on my system and nothing else and this shit is fucking obtuse. It’s ridiculous how many competing audio frameworks there currently are.

        • pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There are only 2 current audio frameworks, right? PipeWire (most current, best compatibility from what I’ve seen) and PulseAudio (dominant for a long time but now being replaced by PipeWire)

          • orclev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 month ago

            Sort of kind of. The actual drivers are still ALSA which both pulse and pipewire build on top of. Then there’s JACK which is older but basically tried to be Pipewire before Pipewire. Lastly there’s WirePlumber which is an automation/scripting thing built on top of Pipewire. So depending on what you’re doing you end up having to wrangle with a minimum of Pipewire and ALSA, and might also need to mess with WirePlumber and Pulse (as Pipewire exposes a Pulse API).

            • tekato@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Just install wireplumber, plus the pipewire modules for alsa and pulseaudio (pipewire-alsa and pipewire-pulse, respectively). These 3 will run any audio application.

      • tekato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Wine (which Proton is based on) has had support for Wayland since version 9.0 (about half a year old). Admittedly it’s not even enabled by default, but it works and I’ve played Path Of Exile through wine’s Wayland backend. There’s talks to ship the Wayland driver along X11, but not enabled by default yet, since there’s still some issues before they consider it on par with X11 backend. Proton might take longer, since I don’t think Valve will enable that before they add Wayland support for the Steam client.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Headline in another universe:

    “Microsoft aiming to push population into switching to Linux.”

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I feel like people concerned about the expense of a new computer aren’t generally going to look at Macs, but I’m not too familiar with their longevity/support; is it a good length of time?

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          oh but many people cannot install linux easily its only rlly installed by people who know about tech mac might be their only option but idk how your gonna use mac for gaming ik also people are gonna still stick to windows 11 cause microsoft

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Devices running an unsupported version of Windows will still function, but Microsoft doesn’t provide the following: Technical support of any issue

    Oh, you mean the support forums? I don’t think those have ever helped anyone

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Man I really don’t want to switch to Linux but Microsoft has ended things forever with Recall. There’s just no way to stay with microsoft long term.

    • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Fixed it for you:

      Company renders 60%+ of computers running current software incapable of running new software due to niche hardware requirement, abruptly ends support for current version next year, and tells users to throw away their computers and buy new ones.

      Oh, and they’re promoting their cloud storage option. Which may or may not have anything to do with their data harvesting? I don’t really know on that one.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        “Abrupt” and “current” are pretty generous for windows 10 tbh. This has been a known deadline for several years at this point, and windows 11 has been out since 2021.

        Absolutely fuck microsoft with a cactus, but this is hardly new or surprising at this point.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          By “abrupt,” I mean that Windows 7 ended service updates just last year, and Windows 10 will end next year. And by “current,” I mean that Windows 11 overtook 7 as the second most used version of Windows in 2022.

          We’ve known that they’re ending support for 10 next year for a few years, but that end of life timeline is very short compared to previous versions of Windows. If 10 had the same end of life timeline as 7, we’d be seeing service updates for 10 ending in 2030. And 11 may be the newest version of Windows, but it is by all means not the most used version and is most likely not the version currently being used by most people that this article is relevant to.

    • willya@lemmyf.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not here on Lemmy where you should be able to run it on a tamagotchi for free.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Don’t TPMs just deal with cryptography code the same way a SIM card does for a phone? If you have one, What’s wrong with using it?

      • a_postmodern_hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Platforms like Windows and Chrome can also use it for remote attestation, i.e., verifying you haven’t bypassed security controls and locking you out if they think you have.

        I keep mine enabled because it’s good for secure boot and secrets handling.

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I still for the life of me can’t figure out what’s so great about secure boot and tpm. All it’s ever done for me is prevent me from booting a legitimate OS, or a bootable flash drive with iso images on it (like ventoy). It’s also pretty good at giving me a headache trying to figure out how the keys work and how to register them.

    I just turn them both off and live in ignorant bliss.

    • orclev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Secure boot and TPM are tools for (among other things) making sure nobody (E.G. a virus or worm) has tampered with your OS and bootloader. You can for instance use both on Linux, it’s just by default they come preloaded with Microsofts configuration for loading Windows, and the technical knowledge for how to reconfigure it is a bit arcane.

      It’s an excellent security tool, it’s just abused by Microsoft to discourage competition.

    • ooterness@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s not for you, it’s for them. Secure boot means it only runs their operating system, not yours. Trusted enclave means it secures their DRM-ware from tampering by the user who owns the PC.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        Secure boot means that only the intended bootloader runs, it can be any one, but it just needs to be the intended one.

        Secure boot works with Linux.

        • ooterness@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          It works for now on x86-64, yes. For now. As always, we are one “think of the children” crisis away from lobbyists taking that option away.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            What? I think you maybe just don’t know what purpose secure boot serves.

            It’s not a tool to vendor lock computers, it’s a tool to establish a chain of trust to protect the boot process by only allowing cryptographically signed images from executing. Anyone can sign things for secure boot by simply creating an x509 certificate and importing it. If vendors wanted to prevent you from running a different operating system, they would just lock it down completely as is done in many devices like mobile phones and proprietary electronics.

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        What do you mean? I remove all vendor keys and enroll my own secure boot keys. This way only my install with my bootloader signed by my keys will boot.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    Boo hoo, I need a TPM, recent SIMD instructions, and DirectX12 support to be able to boot. Please help!

    Boo hoo! 🎻